§

Clear Pine Mouldings

238 N.L.R.B. 69 (N.L.R.B. 1978)
Clear Pine Mouldings

7 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 705 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.

    343 U.S. 395 (1952)   Cited 267 times
    Determining that negotiation of labor contract had not rendered case moot

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Magnavox Co. of Tennessee

    415 U.S. 322 (1974)   Cited 76 times
    In Magnavox, the Board changed its bifurcated rule and adopted the Eighth Circuit's view that the union had no power to waive employee distribution rights on behalf of either itself or another union.

  4. Hinson v. N.L.R.B

    428 F.2d 133 (8th Cir. 1970)   Cited 81 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Section 302 "does not comprehend solely a collective bargaining agreement to the exclusion of any other possible written agreement"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Herman Sausage Co

    275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960)   Cited 79 times
    In NLRB v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960), our circuit held that "generally speaking, the freedom to grant a unilateral wage increase "is limited to cases where there has been a bona fide but unsuccessful attempt to reach an agreement with the union, or where the union bears the guilt for having broken off relations.' NLRB v. Andrew Jergens Co., 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 130, 136, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 827, 70 S.Ct. 76, 94 L.Ed. 503.

  6. NLRB v. United Broth., Carpenters Joiners

    531 F.2d 424 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 28 times
    Upholding Board's conclusion where employer had "not met its burden of negativing the General Counsel's findings"

  7. American National Ins. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    187 F.2d 307 (5th Cir. 1951)   Cited 18 times

    No. 13198. February 23, 1951. Rehearing Denied April 2, 1951. Louis J. Dibrell, Chas. G. Dibrell, Galveston, Tex., for petitioner. Louis Libbin, Atty., A. Norman Somers, Asst. General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, all of Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and McCORD and BORAH, Circuit Judges. HUTCHESON, Chief Judge. Proceeded against by the board, found guilty of violations of the National Labor Relations Act,