§

Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.

346 N.L.R.B. 696 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Fibreboard Corp. v. Labor Board

    379 U.S. 203 (1964)   Cited 731 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "contracting out" of work traditionally performed by bargaining unit employees is a mandatory subject of bargaining under the NLRA

  2. First National Maintenance Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    452 U.S. 666 (1981)   Cited 269 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer has no duty to bargain over a decision to shut down part of its business purely for economic reasons

  3. Searock v. Stripling

    736 F.2d 650 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 217 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "control is the test" for whether documents need to be produced, where control "is defined not only as possession, but as the legal right to obtain the documents requested upon demand"

  4. St. George Warehouse, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    420 F.3d 294 (3d Cir. 2005)   Cited 36 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Explaining that under a substantial evidence standard of review, an administrative fact-finder's determinations on issues of credibility should not be reversed unless inherently incredible or patently unreasonable

  5. Furniture Rentors of America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    36 F.3d 1240 (3d Cir. 1994)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer was not required to bargain over subcontracting because decision was based on reduced productivity, damaged product, customer complaints, and employee theft rather than labor costs

  6. Dorsey Trailers v. National Labor Relations

    134 F.3d 125 (3d Cir. 1998)   Cited 10 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 96-3392 and 96-3578. Argued June 26, 1997. Filed January 13, 1998. Michael S. Mitchell, Esq., Robert E. Larkin, III, Esq., Fisher Phillips, 201 St. Charles Avenue, Suite 3710, New Orleans, Louisiana 70170, Attorneys for Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, Dorsey Trailers. Robert J. Englehart, Esq., Charles P. Donnelly, Esq., Aileen A. Armstrong, Esq., National Labor Relations Board, 1099 14th Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20570, Attorney for Respondent/Cross Petitioner, National Labor Relations Board

  7. Congreso de Uniones Industriales v. N.L.R.B

    966 F.2d 36 (1st Cir. 1992)   Cited 6 times
    Writing that an employer's duty to supply relevant information also "extends to situations where the information is not in the employer's possession, but where the information can likely be obtained from a third party with whom the employer has a business relationship that is directly implicated in the alleged breach of the collective-bargaining agreement."

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second