§

Clayton-Willard Sales

126 N.L.R.B. 1325 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
Clayton-Willard Sales

31 Cited authorities

  1. Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board

    313 U.S. 177 (1941)   Cited 871 times
    Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

  2. Republic Steel Corp. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 7 (1940)   Cited 231 times   3 Legal Analyses
    In Republic Steel, supra, the Court refused to enforce an order requiring the employer to pay the full amount of back pay to an employee who had been paid to work for the Work Projects Administration in the meantime.

  3. Labor Board v. Cheney Lumber Co.

    327 U.S. 385 (1946)   Cited 137 times
    Noting § 10(e) insures that "all controversies of fact, and the allowable inferences from the facts, be threshed out . . . in the first instance before the Board"

  4. Wilson v. United States

    162 U.S. 613 (1896)   Cited 459 times
    Rejecting claim that defendant's statement to investigating commissioner was involuntarily given, noting it is not essential to admissibility that confessor be warned that what he said could be used against him

  5. Labor Board v. I. M. Electric Co.

    318 U.S. 9 (1943)   Cited 108 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Indiana Michigan Electric Co., 318 U.S. 9, at page 28, 63 S.Ct. 394, at page 405, 87 L.Ed. 579, the Supreme Court stated the general fundamental principles with respect to findings of fact by the Board, saying that the reviewing court is given discretion to see that before a party's rights are foreclosed his case has been fairly heard, and "Findings cannot be said to have been fairly reached unless material evidence which might impeach, as well as that which will support, its findings, is heard and weighed."

  6. People v. Santo

    43 Cal.2d 319 (Cal. 1954)   Cited 141 times
    In People v. Santo (1954) 43 Cal.2d 319 [ 273 P.2d 249], for example, we held that the trial court properly admitted evidence of flight occurring more than a month after the charged murder because the facts fairly supported that inference.

  7. United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co.

    118 U.S. 120 (1886)   Cited 161 times
    Stating that when the Government became the owner of certain negotiable paper, "[it took] such paper subject to all the equities [then] existing against the person from whom [it] . . . acquire[d] . . . title," except that its claim could not be barred by the state limitations period

  8. Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Bd.

    87 F.2d 146 (5th Cir. 1936)   Cited 74 times
    In Agwilines, Inc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 87 F.2d 146, 147, and in Waterman S.S. Corporation v. National Labor Relations Board, 5 Cir., 119 F.2d 760, a contempt proceeding involving the ascertainment of back payments necessary to make employees whole, we dealt with the purpose and effect of the "make whole" provisions of the statute.

  9. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Condenser Corp.

    128 F.2d 67 (3d Cir. 1942)   Cited 62 times

    No. 7683. Argued January 5, 1942. Decided March 25, 1942. Appeal from the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the Board against Condenser Corporation of America and Cornell-Dubilier Electric Corporation, and Electrical Condensers Union, Local B-1041, of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, intervenor. A petition for leave to adduce additional evidence was filed. Petition for an enforcing decree granted with

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ford

    170 F.2d 735 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 49 times

    No. 10605. November 15, 1948. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order of the board against Wilbur H. Ford and others, doing business as Ford Brothers. Decree of enforcement granted. Harold Cranefield, of Detroit, Mich., and Robert N. Denham, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., of Washington, D.C. (David P. Finding, Ruth Weyand, and Thomas F. Maher, all of Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner