§

Classic Lath & Plastering, Inc.

01-CA-042734 (N.L.R.B. Feb. 11, 2009)
Classic Lath & Plastering, Inc.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Howard Johnson Co. v. Detroit Local Joint Exec. Bd., Hotel & Rest. Emps. & Bartenders Int'l Union, AFL-CIO

    417 U.S. 249 (1974)   Cited 368 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding under NLRA that purchaser of hotel assets was not required to arbitrate with union about its decision not to hire all of seller’s employees

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  3. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Greater Kansas City Roofing

    2 F.3d 1047 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 97 times
    Holding it was error to hold sole shareholder personally liable for judgment against corporation she controlled because that there was no evidence to suggest her disregard for many corporate formalities constituted fraud or was done to cause the company to be less able to pay a judgment

  5. Sara Lee Bak. Gro. v. Nat. Lab. Rel. Bd.

    514 F.3d 422 (5th Cir. 2008)   Cited 22 times
    Holding that a "`bare assertion' of relevancy falls short" of satisfying the union's burden

  6. Union Builders, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    68 F.3d 520 (1st Cir. 1995)   Cited 9 times
    Explaining that employers must "divulge information of even merely potential relevance"

  7. Local No. 150, International Union of Operating Engineers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    480 F.2d 1186 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 29 times

    No. 71-1689. June 20, 1973. Bernard M. Baum, Daniel S. Shulman, Robert H. Baum, Chicago, Ill., and J. Albert Woll, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for petitioner. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., at the time the brief was filed, Charles N. Steele, and Alan D. Cirker, Washington, D.C., Attys., N.L.R.B., were on the brief for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before McGOWAN, Circuit Judge, and WINTER

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Scott Printing Corp.

    612 F.2d 783 (3d Cir. 1979)   Cited 18 times
    In Scott Printing Corp., for example, the employer, Scott Printing, informed the union that it would have to sell or shut down its composing room because it could not compete with non-union composition.

  9. Great American Ins. Co. v. Frank Briscoe Co., Inc.

    661 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 2 times

    661 F.2d 940 (9th Cir. 1981) Great American Ins. Co. v. Frank Briscoe Co., Inc. No. 79-4656 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit August 24, 1981 Editorial Note: This opinion is published in the Federal reporter in a table titled §Table of decisions without reported opinions§. These decisions do not meet the specific criteria for publication and these decisions cannot be cited unless being used for res judicata or collateral estoppel. (Ninth Circuit Rules, Rule 36-3,28 U.S.C.A.) D.Mont. AFFIRMED

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.

    444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971)   Cited 3 times   3 Legal Analyses

    No. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second