§
Classic Coach

8 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Robbins Tire & Rubber Co.

    437 U.S. 214 (1978)   Cited 963 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a FOIA requestor's rights are neither “diminished” nor “enhanced” in light of a “particular, litigation-generated need for these materials”

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Insurance Co. of America

    390 U.S. 254 (1968)   Cited 326 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "all of the incidents of the relationship must be assessed and weighed with no one factor being decisive"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Committee on Masonic Homes, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    556 F.2d 214 (3d Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Finding that union authorization cards were not "compiled for law enforcement purposes," and stating that "`law enforcement purposes' must relate to some kind of formal proceeding, and one that is pending"

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Overseas Motors, Inc.

    818 F.2d 517 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 14 times

    No. 86-5225. Argued February 2, 1987. Decided May 11, 1987. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Nancy Hunt (argued), Peter Winkler, Bernard Gottfried, Director Region 7, N.L.R.B., Patrick McNamara, Detroit, Mich., for petitioner. J. Laevin Weiner (argued), C. Robert Wartell, William E. Sigler, Maddin, Weiner, Hauser, Wartell and Roth, Southfield, Mich., for respondent. Petition from the National Labor Relations Board. Before KENNEDY, JONES and NORRIS, Circuit

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Honaker Mills, Div. of Top Form M

    789 F.2d 262 (4th Cir. 1986)   Cited 6 times
    Noting that some of the judge's remarks about which the plaintiff complained were "at least innocuous, and at most injudicious," but "[did] not rise to the level necessary to support the serious charge of judicial bias"

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Pepsi Cola Bottling Co, Mansfield

    455 F.2d 1134 (6th Cir. 1972)   Cited 3 times

    No. 71-1266. February 14, 1972. Arthur Fox, II, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Eugene G. Goslee, Acting Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. William A. Busemeyer, Cincinnati, Ohio, for respondent; Lindhorst Dreidame, Cincinnati, Ohio, on brief. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, WEICK, Circuit Judge

  8. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,873 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions