31 Cited authorities
A.F. of L. v. Labor Board
308 U.S. 401 (1940) Cited 340 timesHolding that certification is not a final order
Pittsburgh Glass Co. v. Board
313 U.S. 146 (1941) Cited 294 timesIn Pittsburgh Glass, the Court held that it was not a denial of due process for the Board to refuse to consider evidence relating to the certification issue when petitioner first sought to introduce such evidence at the unfair labor practice hearing.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tennessee Packers, Inc.
379 F.2d 172 (6th Cir. 1967) Cited 77 timesHearing on objections is required only if substantial factual questions are raised by objections
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bata Shoe Co.
377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir. 1967) Cited 65 timesIn NLRB v. Bata Shoe Co., 377 F.2d 821 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 389 U.S. 917, 88 S.Ct. 238, 19 L.Ed.2d 265 (1967), upon which Randall relies, the employer presented specific evidence of more severe procedural irregularities that demonstrably affected the election results.
N.L.R.B. v. S.S. Logan Packing Company
386 F.2d 562 (4th Cir. 1967) Cited 52 timesIn NLRB v. Logan Packing Co., 4 Cir., 386 F.2d 562, decided this day, we have considered at some length the serious unreliability of signed authorization cards as an indication of the wishes of a majority of the employees.
N.L.R.B. v. National Survey Service, Inc.
361 F.2d 199 (7th Cir. 1966) Cited 30 timesIn National Survey this Court concluded that the Board was not required to conduct a hearing on an employer's objections to a regional director's findings of fact where the employer's objections raised no substantial and material issues of fact.
Lucas v. United States
355 F.2d 245 (10th Cir. 1966) Cited 28 timesNo. 8367. January 24, 1966. James F. Fellingham, Oklahoma City, Okla., for appellant. Benjamin E. Franklin, Asst. U.S. Atty. (Newell A. George, U.S. Atty., on the brief), for appellee. Before PICKETT, LEWIS and HILL, Circuit Judges. HILL, Circuit Judge. The appellant, Ernest Clifford Lucas, and his codefendant, Shirley Ann Haygood, who has not appealed, were convicted by a jury on all three counts of an information charging them with committing the offenses of the unlawful sale and transfer of heroin
Neuhoff Brothers, Packers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
362 F.2d 611 (5th Cir. 1966) Cited 25 timesNo. 22917. June 17, 1966. Fritz L. Lyne, Lyne, Blanchette, Smith Shelton, George C. Dunlap, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, George B. Driesen, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter Giesey, Atty., N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, RIVES, Circuit Judge, and CHOATE, District Judge. TUTTLE, Chief Judge: This is a petition brought by the company to set aside an order of the National Labor
Howell Refining Company v. N.L.R.B
400 F.2d 213 (5th Cir. 1968) Cited 21 timesNo. 24802. August 12, 1968. Frank S. Manitzas, Theo F. Weiss, San Antonio, Tex., for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, William H. Carder, Atty., NLRB, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before RIVES, GEWIN and THORNBERRY, Circuit Judges. GEWIN, Circuit Judge: Howell Refining Company petitions this court to review and set aside an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued against it on May 10, 1967. The order requires the company to cease and desist from unfair labor practices
Wyman-Gordon Company v. N.L.R.B
397 F.2d 394 (1st Cir. 1968) Cited 20 timesTransmitting list of names and addresses to union for election purposes is not violation of § 302
Section 554 - Adjudications
5 U.S.C. § 554 Cited 1,043 times 31 Legal AnalysesGranting authority to agencies to "issue a declaratory order to terminate a controversy or remove uncertainty."