Clark Bros. Co., Inc.

14 Cited authorities

Securities Comm'n v. Chenery Corp.
318 U.S. 80 (1943) Cited 3,724 times 15 Legal Analyses
Holding that "an administrative order cannot be upheld unless the grounds upon which the agency acted in exercising its powers were those upon which its action can be sustained"
Board of Education v. Barnette
319 U.S. 624 (1943) Cited 1,681 times 12 Legal Analyses
Holding students cannot be compelled to recite the Pledge of Allegiance during World War II
Hague v. C.I.O
307 U.S. 496 (1939) Cited 1,603 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that to establish a claim under the Privileges and Immunities Clause, plaintiffs must allege discrimination on the basis of out-of-state residency
Labor Board v. Laughlin
301 U.S. 1 (1937) Cited 1,491 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis
Thomas v. Collins
323 U.S. 516 (1945) Cited 877 times 4 Legal Analyses
Holding that a state may regulate labor unions but "[s]uch regulation ... must not trespass upon the domain set apart for ... free assembly"
Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board
324 U.S. 793 (1945) Cited 493 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."
Virginia Electric Co. v. Board
319 U.S. 533 (1943) Cited 324 times
Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"
Labor Board v. Link-Belt Co.
311 U.S. 584 (1941) Cited 338 times
Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"
I.A. of M. v. Labor Board
311 U.S. 72 (1940) Cited 316 times
In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."
Labor Board v. Waterman S.S. Co.
309 U.S. 206 (1940) Cited 219 times
Granting passes to one of two rival unions to go aboard ship to contact men

Clark Bros. Co., Inc.

14 Cited authorities

Holding that "an administrative order cannot be upheld unless the grounds upon which the agency acted in exercising its powers were those upon which its action can be sustained"

Holding students cannot be compelled to recite the Pledge of Allegiance during World War II

Holding that to establish a claim under the Privileges and Immunities Clause, plaintiffs must allege discrimination on the basis of out-of-state residency

Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis

Holding that a state may regulate labor unions but "[s]uch regulation ... must not trespass upon the domain set apart for ... free assembly"

Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

Stating that the purpose of the Act is to encourage and protect "full freedom of association for workers"

Finding a violation of the Act when a supervisor mistakenly believed an employee was involved with the union and discharged him "because of his alleged union activities"

Granting passes to one of two rival unions to go aboard ship to contact men