§

City Welding & Manufacturing Co.

191 N.L.R.B. 124 (N.L.R.B. 1971)
City Welding & Manufacturing Co.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  2. Labor Board v. Cabot Carbon Co.

    360 U.S. 203 (1959)   Cited 57 times
    Concluding that "dealing with" as used in 29 U.S.C. § 152 is a "broad term" and is not synonymous to "bargaining with"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Griggs Equipment, Inc.

    307 F.2d 275 (5th Cir. 1962)   Cited 52 times
    In Griggs, the issue was not even mentioned in the Board's Decision, but is noted in the decision of the court of appeals.

  4. Ohio Power Co. v. N.L.R.B

    176 F.2d 385 (6th Cir. 1949)   Cited 64 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that plain and unambiguous text must be applied as written without resort to construction

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Walton Manufacturing Company

    289 F.2d 177 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 32 times

    No. 18345. March 17, 1961. Russell Specter, Atty., N.L.R.B., Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert T. Thompson, Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Wilson, Branch Barwick, J. Frank Ogletree, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before RIVES and WISDOM, Circuit Judges, and CHRISTENBERRY, District Judge. RIVES, Circuit Judge. This petition seeks enforcement

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Barney's Supercenter, Inc.

    296 F.2d 91 (3d Cir. 1961)   Cited 12 times

    No. 13596. Argued October 5, 1961. Decided November 16, 1961. Marion L. Griffin, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Allison W. Brown, Jr., Attys. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Jack J. Rosenberg, Pittsburgh, Pa., for respondent. Before GOODRICH, STALEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. STALEY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board ("Board") seeks enforcement of an order

  7. Loc. 153, Int. Ladies' Garment v. N.L.R.B

    443 F.2d 667 (D.C. Cir. 1970)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 23457, 23562, 23653. Argued September 25, 1970. Decided November 9, 1970. Certiorari Denied June 7, 1971. See 91 S.Ct. 2206. Mr. Max Zimny, New York City, for petitioner in No. 23,457. Messrs. Jerry D. Anker, Washington, D.C., and Morris P. Glushien, New York City, also entered appearances for petitioner in No. 23,457. Mr. Jerome Weinstein, of the bar of the Supreme Court of Michigan, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, for petitioner in No. 23,562 and respondent in Nos. 23,457 and 23,653

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Pruden Products Company

    422 F.2d 855 (7th Cir. 1970)

    No. 17687. February 12, 1970. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, Douglas L. Leslie, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Paul J. Spielberg, RobertaMarie Kiley, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Myron E. Ropella, Milwaukee, Wis., Ropella Parent, Milwaukee, Wis., for respondent, Pruden Products Co. Before HASTINGS, Senior Circuit Judge, CUMMINGS and KERNER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This matter is before us on application of the National

  9. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Bird Mach. Co.

    161 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1947)   Cited 20 times

    No. 4219. May 20, 1947. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against Bird Machine Company for an enforcement of an order of the board. Decree enforcing order of board granted. Owsley Vose, N.L.R.B., of Washington, D.C. (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Glushein, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Frances Lopinsky, all of Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner

  10. Section 152 - Definitions

    29 U.S.C. § 152   Cited 3,213 times   27 Legal Analyses
    Defining a supervisor to include “any individual having authority . . . to hire, transfer, suspend, lay off, recall, promote, discharge, assign, reward, or discipline other employees, or responsibly to direct them, or to adjust their grievances, or effectively to recommend such action, if in connection with the foregoing the exercise of such authority is not of a merely routine or clerical nature, but requires the use of independent judgment”