§

City Stationery, Inc.

340 N.L.R.B. 523 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
City Stationery, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Saint-Gobain Indus. Ceramics, Inc v. N.L.R.B

    310 F.3d 778 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 2 times

    No. 01-1365. Argued November 1, 2002. Decided November 26, 2002. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Alisa L. Pittman argued the cause for petitioner. With her on the briefs was Stanford G. Wilson. John R. McIntyre, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the briefs were Arthur F. Rosenfeld, General Counsel, John H. Ferguson, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy

  4. Jeannette Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    532 F.2d 916 (3d Cir. 1976)   Cited 25 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Sustaining the Board's finding that the employer's rule broadly prohibiting wage discussions was an unfair labor practice under § 8, reasoning that "wage discussions can be protected activity and that an employer's unqualified rule barring such discussions has the tendency to inhibit such activity"

  5. Majestic Molded Products, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 603 (2d Cir. 1964)   Cited 26 times
    In Majestic Molded Products, Inc., v. N.L.R.B., (2 Cir. 1964) 330 F.2d 603, 606, the layoffs were also in order of seniority.