City Disposal Systems, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.
363 U.S. 574 (1960) Cited 5,612 times 6 Legal Analyses
Holding that grievance machinery “is at the very heart of the system of industrial self-government” and the courts should not deny an order to arbitrate “unless it may be said with positive assurance that the arbitration clause is not susceptible of an interpretation that covers the asserted dispute”
Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.
363 U.S. 593 (1960) Cited 3,893 times 2 Legal Analyses
Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator
Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.
363 U.S. 564 (1960) Cited 2,229 times 1 Legal Analyses
Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”
ARO, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
596 F.2d 713 (6th Cir. 1979) Cited 33 times
In ARO, Inc. v. NLRB, 596 F.2d 713, 718 (6th Cir. 1979), this court held, "For an individual claim or complaint to amount to concerted action under the Act it must... be made with the object of inducing or preparing for group action...."
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal Analyses
Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"

City Disposal Systems, Inc.

5 Cited authorities

Steelworkers v. Warrior Gulf Co.

Steelworkers v. Enterprise Corp.

Holding that a reviewing court should not refuse to enforce an arbitral award merely because it would read the collective bargaining agreement differently than the arbitrator

Steelworkers v. Am. Mfg. Co.

Holding that because the parties bargained for the “arbitrator's judgment,” the underlying “question of contract interpretation” is for the arbitrator, and the courts have “no business weighing the merits of the grievance”

ARO, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

In ARO, Inc. v. NLRB, 596 F.2d 713, 718 (6th Cir. 1979), this court held, "For an individual claim or complaint to amount to concerted action under the Act it must... be made with the object of inducing or preparing for group action...."

Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy

Finding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"