Citizens Publishing & Printing Co.

13 Cited authorities

  1. New York Times Co. v. Sullivan

    376 U.S. 254 (1964)   Cited 7,006 times   36 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a public official or public figure can recover damages for defamation on a matter of public concern only if he proves that the speaker acted with actual malice
  2. Bill Johnson's Restaurants, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    461 U.S. 731 (1983)   Cited 978 times   17 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB could not bar an employer from pursuing a well-grounded lawsuit for damages under state law
  3. Linn v. Plant Guard Workers

    383 U.S. 53 (1966)   Cited 732 times   16 Legal Analyses
    Holding as preempted all defamation actions in labor disputes except those published with actual malice
  4. Lechmere, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    502 U.S. 527 (1992)   Cited 156 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board erred in finding that employer should have allowed union on its premises because it had no other way to reach its target audience, inasmuch as in reaching its decision the Board misconstrued prior Supreme Court precedent
  5. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Augusta Bakery Corp.

    957 F.2d 1467 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 45 times
    Holding that the replacements were temporary because, although the replacements were told that "if they worked out and did their job, they had a job," the testimony of the replacements indicated that they did not understand themselves to be permanent employees
  7. Dougherty v. Boyertown Times

    377 Pa. Super. 462 (Pa. Super. Ct. 1988)   Cited 39 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that letter to newspaper falsely accusing chiropractor of overcharging addressed matter of public concern because by adopting law regulating chiropractic practice, "the legislature has implicitly stated that the quality of chiropractic services rendered in this Commonwealth is a matter of public concern"
  8. Northern Wire Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    887 F.2d 1313 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 22 times

    Nos. 88-3278, 88-3461. Argued June 6, 1989. Decided October 26, 1989. Jack D. Walker, Susan C. Sheeran, Melli, Walker, Pease Ruhly, Madison, Wis., for Northern Wire Corporation. Aileen A. Armstrong, Collis Suzanne Stocking, Robert F. Mace, N.L.R.B. Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C., Joseph A. Szabo, N.L.R.B., Milwaukee, Wis., for N.L.R.B. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before CUDAHY, MANION and KANNE, Circuit Judges. CUDAHY, Circuit Judge. The

  9. Foods v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    82 F.3d 1113 (D.C. Cir. 1996)   Cited 9 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Concluding that the employer's statement to the striking employees that it had hired permanent replacements was truthful when made
  10. N.L.R.B. v. American Linen Supply Co.

    945 F.2d 1428 (8th Cir. 1991)   Cited 12 times

    No. 90-1467. Submitted December 13, 1990. Decided October 4, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied December 4, 1991. Frederick Havard, Washington, D.C., argued (Jerry M. Hunter, Robert E. Allen and Aileen A. Armstrong, Washington, D.C., on brief), for petitioner. William Harding, Lincoln, Neb., argued (Jack L. Shultz and Jerry L. Pigsley, Lincoln, Neb., and Cecil R. Hedger, Denver, Colo., on brief), for respondent. Petition for enforcement of order from National Labor Relations Board. Before