§

Cincinnati Paperboard

339 N.L.R.B. 1079 (N.L.R.B. 2003)
Cincinnati Paperboard

5 Cited authorities

  1. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  2. Uforma/Shelby Business Forms, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    111 F.3d 1284 (6th Cir. 1997)   Cited 93 times
    Holding that "Rule 408 does not exclude evidence of alleged threats to retaliate for protected activity when the statements occurred during negotiations focused on the protected activity and the evidence serves to prove liability either for making, or later acting upon, the threats" because the evidence was not introduced in order to prove the validity of the grievance which served as the subject of the negotiations

  3. N.L.R.B. v. U.S. Postal Service

    8 F.3d 832 (D.C. Cir. 1993)   Cited 50 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Upholding postal service's exercise of contractual right to reduce employees' hours in response to budget reduction

  4. Beverly California Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    227 F.3d 817 (7th Cir. 2000)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an employer may not probe directly or indirectly into an employee's reasons for supporting a union

  5. N.L.R.B. v. United Technologies Corp.

    884 F.2d 1569 (2d Cir. 1989)   Cited 18 times   2 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 1095, 1096, Dockets 89-4003, 89-4009. Argued May 8, 1989. Decided September 13, 1989. Edward J. Dempsey, Director, Indus. Relations Labor Counsel, United Technologies Corp., Hartford, Conn., for respondent/intervenor United Technologies Corp. Judith P. Flower, Washington, D.C. (Barbara A. Atkin, Supervisory Attorney, Joseph E. Desio, Acting Gen. Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate Gen. Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for