Cimato Bros., Inc.
4 Cited authorities
International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988) Cited 119 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice
Penntech Papers, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
706 F.2d 18 (1st Cir. 1983) Cited 121 timesHolding that same day notice was inadequate where company failed to bargain in good faith after the closure
Vance v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
71 F.3d 486 (4th Cir. 1995) Cited 17 timesFinding a single employer where interrelation of operations, common ownership, or centralized control of labor relations are present
Panek v. Cimato Bros. Construction, Inc.
02-CV-333(A) (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2007) Cited 2 times02-CV-333(A). October 15, 2007 DECISION AND ORDER RICHARD ARCARA, District Judge INTRODUCTION Laborers' Local No. 210 brought this action against Cimato Bros. Construction, Inc., a construction company that employs both union and nonunion laborers, to enforce a series of collective bargaining agreements, even though Cimato never signed the agreements and never joined the multi-employer bargaining unit that negotiated them. Local 210 claims that Cimato is nevertheless bound by the agreements, because