10 Cited authorities
Labor Board v. American Ins. Co.
343 U.S. 395 (1952) Cited 269 timesHolding the degree of discretion in a CBA "is an issue for determination across the bargaining table, not by the Board"
Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.
351 U.S. 149 (1956) Cited 223 times 8 Legal AnalysesHolding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed Prince MFG
205 F.2d 131 (1st Cir. 1953) Cited 118 timesIn Reed Prince, supra, this court affirmed the Board's finding of refusal to bargain in good faith only "[a]fter an attentive review of the entire record of the bargaining negotiations."
N.L.R.B. v. General Electric Company
418 F.2d 736 (2d Cir. 1969) Cited 63 timesOffering better terms to union locals while bargaining with the unions' national bargaining representative
N.L.R.B. v. Herman Sausage Co
275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960) Cited 79 timesIn NLRB v. Herman Sausage Co., 275 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1960), our circuit held that "generally speaking, the freedom to grant a unilateral wage increase "is limited to cases where there has been a bona fide but unsuccessful attempt to reach an agreement with the union, or where the union bears the guilt for having broken off relations.' NLRB v. Andrew Jergens Co., 9 Cir., 1949, 175 F.2d 130, 136, cert. denied, 338 U.S. 827, 70 S.Ct. 76, 94 L.Ed. 503.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Natl. Shoes
208 F.2d 688 (2d Cir. 1953) Cited 29 timesDeciding that the employerengaged in an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8 where the record contained evidence of “[l]ong delays unaccounted for in the matter of correspondence and the preparation of documents, the postponement of meetings of the negotiators for weeks at a time, and the reopening of questions previously settled”
Collins Aikman Corporation v. N.L.R.B
395 F.2d 277 (4th Cir. 1968) Cited 5 timesNo. 11533. Argued December 7, 1967. Decided May 8, 1968. W.S. Blakeney, Charlotte, N.C. (Blakeney, Alexander Machen, Charlotte, N.C., on the brief), for petitioner. Leonard M. Wagman, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., on the brief), for respondent. Before HAYNSWORTH, Chief Judge, and WINTER and BUTZNER, Circuit Judges. WINTER, Circuit Judge: The petition of Collins
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United Clay Mines
219 F.2d 120 (6th Cir. 1955) Cited 17 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. United Clay Mines Corp., 6 Cir., 219 F.2d 120, 125 in reversing a N.L.R.B. finding that the employer was guilty of unfair labor practices by refusing to bargain in good faith, the court held that lack of good faith could be shown only by conduct "clearly showing an intent not to enter into a contract".
Division 1142, Etc. v. N.L.R.B
294 F.2d 264 (D.C. Cir. 1961) Cited 4 timesNo. 16007. Argued May 15, 1961. Decided July 6, 1961. Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied En Banc September 12, 1961. Mr. George Schatzki, Dallas, Tex., of the bar of the Supreme Court of Texas, pro hac vice, by special leave of court, and Mr. L.N.D. Wells, Jr., Dallas, Tex., with whom Mr. Bernard Cushman, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. Mrs. Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel
Section 151 - Findings and declaration of policy
29 U.S.C. § 151 Cited 5,092 times 34 Legal AnalysesFinding that "protection by law of the right of employees to organize and bargain collectively safeguards commerce" and declaring a policy of "encouraging the practice and procedure of collective bargaining"