§

Chipotle Services LLC d/b/a Chipotle Mexican Grill

04-CA-147314 (N.L.R.B. Mar. 14, 2016)
Chipotle Services LLC d/b/a Chipotle Mexican Grill

9 Cited authorities

  1. Eastex, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    437 U.S. 556 (1978)   Cited 196 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a newsletter that "urg[ed] employees to write their legislators to oppose incorporation of the state 'right-to-work' statute into a revised state constitution," "criticiz[ed] a Presidential veto of an increase in the federal minimum wage and urg[ed] employees to register to vote" was protected concerted activity

  2. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  3. Romano v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner Smith

    487 U.S. 1205 (1988)   Cited 105 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Upholding conclusion that employees classified as department managers did not meet executive exemption

  4. Adtranz ABB Daimler-Benz Transportation, N.A. v. National Labor Relations

    253 F.3d 19 (D.C. Cir. 2001)   Cited 20 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Finding "derogatory racial or sexual epithets" are not entitled to NLRA protection even when made within the context of union-protected activity

  5. Plaza Auto Ctr., Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    664 F.3d 286 (9th Cir. 2011)   Cited 7 times   5 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 10–72728 10–73125. 2011-12-19 PLAZA AUTO CENTER, INC., Petitioner/Cross–Respondent, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent/Cross–Petitioner. Stephanie R. Leach, Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P., Phoenix, AZ, for the petitioner. Jill A. Griffin and Kira Dellinger Vol, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the respondent. QUIST Stephanie R. Leach, Snell & Wilmer, L.L.P., Phoenix, AZ, for the petitioner. Jill A. Griffin and Kira Dellinger Vol, National Labor Relations Board, Washington

  6. Dreis Krump Mfg. Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    544 F.2d 320 (7th Cir. 1976)   Cited 48 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Upholding Board's refusal to defer on ground that award would violate employee's § 7 rights.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Southern Maryland Hosp. Center

    916 F.2d 932 (4th Cir. 1990)   Cited 17 times
    Noting that “the Board has on several occasions found that employers unreasonably chilled the exercise of their employees' Section 7 rights through excessive surveillance”

  8. Farah Manufacturing Company v. N.L.R.B

    450 F.2d 942 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 2 times

    Nos. 71-1097, 71-1688. Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5th Cir.; see Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5th Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. October 13, 1971. Tommy B. Duke, Neil Martin, Houston, Tex., Kenneth R. Carr, El Paso, Tex., for Farah Manufacturing Co.; Fulbright, Crooker Jaworski, Houston, Tex., of counsel. Jacob Sheinkman, New York City, for El Paso District Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO; Clifford D. Reznicek, Donald D. Congress

  9. Section 1114 - Remedies; infringement; innocent infringement by printers and publishers

    15 U.S.C. § 1114   Cited 8,171 times   90 Legal Analyses
    Holding liable "Any person who shall, without the consent of the registrant — use in commerce any reproduction . . . of a registered mark . . . in connection with which such use is likely to cause confusion."