Childress Buick

13 Cited authorities

  1. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  2. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination
  3. Great Chinese Am. Sewing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    578 F.2d 251 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 35 times
    Holding Board's failure to order restoration of sewing plant was not abuse of discretion in light of trend in garment industry to subcontract sewing work to low-cost foreign companies
  4. N.L.R.B. v. Anchorage Times Pub. Co.

    637 F.2d 1359 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 29 times

    No. 79-7024. Argued and Submitted May 8, 1980. Decided February 27, 1981. Rehearing Denied April 29, 1981. Ruah Donnelly Lahey. Washington, D.C., argued, for petitioner; Elliott Moore, NLRB, Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas A. Riggs, Anchorage, Alaska, argued, for respondent; Karl Johnstown, Anchorage, Alaska, on brief. On Petition to Review and Cross-application to Enforce a Decision of the National Labor Relations Board. Before ANDERSON and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge.

  5. Zurn Industries, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    680 F.2d 683 (9th Cir. 1982)   Cited 13 times

    Nos. 81-7219, 81-7331. Argued and Submitted April 7, 1982. Decided July 2, 1982. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied October. 8, 1982. William B. Moore, Ferguson Burdell, Seattle, Wash., for petitioner. Lawrence Blatnik, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued, for respondent; Andrew F. Tranovich, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. On Petition for Review and Cross-Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before HUG and SKOPIL, Circuit Judges, and SCHWARZER,

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Anthony Co.

    557 F.2d 692 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 18 times

    No. 76-1059. July 18, 1977. Margery E. Lieber, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., argued for petitioner. Larry A. Curtis, argued, Musick, Peeler Garrett, Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent. On Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHAMBERS and WALLACE, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, District Judge. The Honorable E. Avery Crary, Senior United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation. CHAMBERS, Circuit Judge: This is an application

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Warren L. Rose Castings, Inc.

    587 F.2d 1005 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 15 times

    No. 77-3597. December 12, 1978. Elliott Moore, Joseph P. Norelli, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. A. Patrick Nagel, Irvine, Cal., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHAMBERS and HUG, Circuit Judges, and FERGUSON, District Judge. Hon. Warren J. Ferguson, United States District Judge, for the Central District of California, sitting by designation. HUG, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board applies for enforcement of its

  8. Santa Fe Drilling Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    416 F.2d 725 (9th Cir. 1969)   Cited 25 times

    No. 22923. September 18, 1969. James N. Adler (argued) Roderick M. Hills, of Munger, Tolles, Hills Rickershauser, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner. Ronald Wm. Egnor (argued), Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Atty., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before CARTER and HUFSTEDLER, Circuit Judges, and BYRNE, District Judge. Hon. William M. Byrne, Senior Judge, United States District Court for the Central

  9. Golden Day Schools, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    644 F.2d 834 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 10 times
    In Golden Day Schools, 644 F.2d 834, the court noted that although the child care workers' leaflet to parents included harsh language and serious charges about the care of the children, it fell "woefully short of the malicious tone" that would justify a discharge under Jefferson Standard. Appellant correctly points out that the court in Golden Day Schools determined that the leaflet played no part in the discharge of the employees.
  10. N.L.R.B. v. Lowell Sun Publishing Company

    320 F.2d 835 (1st Cir. 1963)   Cited 29 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Lowell Sun Publishing Co., 320 F.2d 835, 841 (1 Cir. 1963), the Board found that the company discharged an employee because of his union activity.