§

Children's Hospital

312 N.L.R.B. 920 (N.L.R.B. 1993)
Children's Hospital

10 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Burns International Security Services, Inc.

    406 U.S. 272 (1972)   Cited 478 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a successor is not bound to substantive terms of previous collective bargaining agreement

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  4. San Diego Newspaper Guild, Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    548 F.2d 863 (9th Cir. 1977)   Cited 50 times
    Rejecting a union's claim for information when the CBA was not up for renewal for two years and there was no evidence of contract negotiations

  5. United Food C. Workers I. U. v. N.L.R.B

    768 F.2d 1463 (D.C. Cir. 1985)   Cited 29 times
    Finding successorship despite difference in some management personnel

  6. Armco, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    832 F.2d 357 (6th Cir. 1987)   Cited 18 times
    In Armco, the Sixth Circuit held that the § 10(b) period did not commence when the employer communicated its intent to recognize another union, but only when the other union actually signed an agreement with the employer, thereby consummating the labor practices violation.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Rockwood Energy and Mineral Corp.

    942 F.2d 169 (3d Cir. 1991)   Cited 11 times
    Holding that the Board could require a "post-hiatus employer" to respect the CBA seniority rights of employees of the pre-hiatus employer despite the five-year hiatus, in part because the "employees had a continuing expectation of employment" throughout that period

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Zayre Corp.

    424 F.2d 1159 (5th Cir. 1970)   Cited 25 times
    Engaging in extensive examination and comparison of the two employers' organizational structures and operations

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Great Western Produce, Inc.

    839 F.2d 555 (9th Cir. 1988)   Cited 3 times

    No. 87-7056. Argued and Submitted August 11, 1987. Decided February 9, 1988. Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Neil Vincent Wake, Michael R. Devitt, Mark C. Dangerfield, Beus, Gilbert, Wake Morrill, Phoenix, Ariz., for respondent. On Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CHAMBERS, SCHROEDER and POOLE, Circuit Judges. POOLE, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board petitions for enforcement

  10. Miami Foundry Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    682 F.2d 587 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 5 times
    Holding a new managing corporation and two stockholders, one owning 59 percent of the corporation and one owning the remainder, to be three joint employers, jointly under a duty to negotiate with the union which had been formed earlier, at a time when the employees were employed by only one of the stockholders