§

Children's Center for Behavioral Development

347 N.L.R.B. 35 (N.L.R.B. 2006)
Children's Center for Behavioral Development

11 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Gissel Packing Co.

    395 U.S. 575 (1969)   Cited 1,035 times   67 Legal Analyses
    Holding a bargaining order may be necessary "to re-establish the conditions as they existed before the employer's unlawful campaign"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  4. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  5. Torrington Extend-A-Care Emp. Ass'n v. N.L.R.B

    17 F.3d 580 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 30 times
    Holding that Board could rely on circumstantial evidence to establish one person's knowledge of another's union activities

  6. Poly-America, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    260 F.3d 465 (5th Cir. 2001)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that strikers who protest unfair labor practices are entitled to unconditional reinstatement

  7. J.L.M., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    31 F.3d 79 (2d Cir. 1994)   Cited 16 times
    Upholding the Board's determination that employee was not a supervisor and noting that "[t]he Board's findings regarding supervisory determinations are entitled to `special weight'"

  8. Webco Industries, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    217 F.3d 1306 (10th Cir. 2000)   Cited 9 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that employer violated the NLRA by allowing one representative group to campaign on work property while prohibiting another from campaigning

  9. United Paperworkers Intern. Union v. N.L.R.B

    981 F.2d 861 (6th Cir. 1992)   Cited 12 times

    No. 91-6260. Argued October 2, 1992. Decided December 2, 1992. Lynn Agee (briefed), Mark Brooks, United Paperworkers Intern. Union, Nashville, Tenn., Peter M. Fox (argued), Thomas J. Kircher, Kircher, Robinson, Cook, Newman Welch, Cincinnati, Ohio, for petitioner. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Peter Winkler, Joseph Oertel (argued and briefed), N.L.R.B., Office of the Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Linda Rabin, N.L.R.B., Region 7, Detroit, Mich., for respondent. Carl E. VerBeek

  10. Teamsters Union No. 688 v. N.L.R.B

    756 F.2d 659 (8th Cir. 1985)   Cited 3 times

    No. 84-1300. Submitted November 15, 1984. Decided March 6, 1985. George O. Suggs, St. Louis, Mo., for petitioner. Alan D. Berkowitz, Philadelphia, Pa., for intervenor. John Ferguson, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review of an order from the National Labor Relations Board. Before BRIGHT, McMILLIAN and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges. McMILLIAN, Circuit Judge. Teamsters Local Union No. 688 (the Union) requests review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) dismissing