§

Chicopee Manufacturing Corp. of Georgia

85 N.L.R.B. 1439 (N.L.R.B. 1949)
Chicopee Manufacturing Corp. of Georgia

15 Cited authorities

  1. Republic Aviation Corp. v. Board

    324 U.S. 793 (1945)   Cited 495 times   34 Legal Analyses
    Finding an absence of special circumstances where employer failed to introduce evidence of "unusual circumstances involving their plants."

  2. I.A. of M. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 72 (1940)   Cited 317 times
    In International Ass'n of Machinists v. N.L.R.B., 1940, 311 U.S. 72, 61 S.Ct. 83, 85 L. Ed. 50, there had been a long history of management favoritism to the established and hostility to the aspiring union; and in Franks Bros. Co. v. N.L.R.B., 1944, 321 U.S. 702, 703, 64 S.Ct. 817, 818, 88 L.Ed. 1020, the employer had "conducted an aggressive campaign against the Union, even to the extent of threatening to close its factory if the union won the election."

  3. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  4. Matter of Sewell Mfg. Co., Inc.

    195 B.R. 180 (Bankr. N.D. Ga. 1996)   Cited 4 times
    Rejecting PBGC's argument that Section 1341 (c) (B) of ERISA required a debtor to file a plan of reorganization and disclosure statement as a necessary prerequisite to a bankruptcy court's distress termination analysis and recognizing case law holding that "ERISA may not be interpreted so as to confound the clear intentions of the Bankruptcy Code's drafters"

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Illinois Tool Works

    153 F.2d 811 (7th Cir. 1946)   Cited 47 times
    Noting that the test for violations of sec. 8, now codified as sec. 8, of the NLRA is whether "the employer engaged in conduct which, it may reasonably be said, tends to interfere with the free exercise of employee rights under the Act," and that actual or successful coercion need not be shown in order for the Board to find a violation

  6. National Labor Rel. Board v. Mylan-Sparta Co.

    166 F.2d 485 (6th Cir. 1948)   Cited 29 times
    In Mylan-Sparta, the Board found the employer in violation of sections 8(a)(1) and 8(a)(3) when it discharged a number of employees for engaging in union activities.

  7. National Lbr. Rel. Bd. v. Piqua M. W. Prod

    109 F.2d 552 (6th Cir. 1940)   Cited 28 times
    In N. L. R. B. v. Piqua Munising Wood Products Co., 109 F.2d 552, 557, the United States Circuit Court said: "All that is requisite in a valid complaint before the Board is that there be a plain statement of the things claimed to constitute an unfair labor practice that respondent may be put upon his defense."

  8. National Labor Bd. v. Fulton Bag, Mills

    175 F.2d 675 (5th Cir. 1949)   Cited 15 times

    No. 12516. July 8, 1949. Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board sitting at Washington, D.C. Proceeding on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for the enforcement of its order against Fulton Bag and Cotton Mills directing that it cease and desist from discouraging union membership and from interfering with employees in exercise of their right to self-organization and directing it to take certain affirmative action. Enforcement granted in part and

  9. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Clarksburg Pub. Co.

    120 F.2d 976 (4th Cir. 1941)   Cited 18 times

    No. 4772. June 10, 1941. On Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Proceeding by the National Labor Relations Board against the Clarksburg Publishing Company for enforcement of a cease and desist order. Order modified and affirmed. David Findling, of Washington, D.C., Atty., National Labor Relations Board (Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, Laurence A. Knapp, Associate Gen. Counsel, Ernest A. Gross, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Richard C. Barrett, and Ralph Winkler, all of

  10. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Winona Textile Mills

    160 F.2d 201 (8th Cir. 1947)   Cited 8 times

    No. 13450. March 4, 1947. Rehearing Denied April 21, 1947. On petition for enforcement of order of National Labor Relations Board. Petition by National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order against the Winona Textile Mills, Inc. Order modified in accordance with opinion and, as modified, enforced. Stanley D. Kane, Atty., National Labor Relations Board, of Minneapolis, Minn., (Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Gen. Counsel, Morris P. Glushien, Associate Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel