§

Chicago Typographical Union

86 N.L.R.B. 1041 (N.L.R.B. 1949)
Chicago Typographical Union

9 Cited authorities

  1. Apex Hosiery Co. v. Leader

    310 U.S. 469 (1940)   Cited 532 times
    Holding that violent union take over of factory did not implicate antitrust laws

  2. United States v. Hutcheson

    312 U.S. 219 (1941)   Cited 382 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that jurisdictional dispute between two unions is a labor dispute

  3. Allen Bradley Co. v. Union

    325 U.S. 797 (1945)   Cited 304 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the defendants were not protected by the statutory labor exemption because the union had combined with contractors and manufacturers in order to boycott the plaintiffs' business

  4. H.J. Heinz Co. v. Labor Board

    311 U.S. 514 (1941)   Cited 241 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In H.J. Heinz Co. v. N.L.R.B., 311 U.S. 514, 61 S.Ct. 320, 85 L.Ed. 309 and Cox v. Gatliff Coal Co., D.C., 59 F. Supp. 882, affirmed 6 Cir., 152 F.2d 52, it was stated that the Act contemplated that a collective bargaining agreement be in writing.

  5. Labor Board v. Bradford Dyeing Assn

    310 U.S. 318 (1940)   Cited 150 times
    Construing "affecting commerce"

  6. Labor Board v. Electric Cleaner Co.

    315 U.S. 685 (1942)   Cited 39 times

    CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT. No. 588. Argued March 5, 1942. Decided March 30, 1942. 1. The finding of the National Labor Relations Board that, by a supplementary oral contract between an employer and a labor union, it was agreed only that new employees would be required to join the union, was supported by substantial evidence. P. 690. 2. The conclusion of the Board that the closed-shop agreement between the employer and a labor union in this case was not valid

  7. Matter of Inland Steel Co., (N.D.Ind. 1980)

    492 F. Supp. 1310 (N.D. Ind. 1980)   Cited 12 times
    In Inland Steel, the district judge examined the structure and legislative history of section 8 of the Act and concluded that Congress did not intend to grant the Secretary of Labor the authority to inspect documents pursuant to a warrant.

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. National Maritime Union of America

    175 F.2d 686 (2d Cir. 1949)   Cited 40 times
    Bargaining for discriminatory hiring hall clause

  9. Matter of Crumpacker v. Batavia Times Publishing Co.

    49 N.E.2d 628 (N.Y. 1943)   Cited 1 times

    Submitted February 23, 1943 Decided April 8, 1943 Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Third Department. Abraham J. Halprin and Sidney R. Rossiter for appellant. William B. Davis and E.C. Sherwood for respondents. Order affirmed, with costs; no opinion. Concur: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY, LEWIS, CONWAY and DESMOND, JJ.