Chicago Tribune Co.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
  2. SCM Corp. v. Advance Business Systems & Supply Co.

    397 U.S. 920 (1970)   Cited 200 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Upholding a delay of three months where only prejudice shown was that the defendants could not recall details of the days in the distant past; no special circumstances
  3. Laidlaw Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    414 F.2d 99 (7th Cir. 1969)   Cited 81 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Holding that while an employer is not obligated to discharge permanent replacements to make room for returning economic strikers, the employer must place the former strikers on a preferential recall list
  4. Hill-Rom Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    957 F.2d 454 (7th Cir. 1992)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 89-3721, 90-1236. Argued November 2, 1990. Decided March 6, 1992. William R. Stewart, N.L.R.B., Contempt Litigation Branch, Aileen A. Armstrong, Robert I. Tendrich (argued), N.L.R.B., Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, D.C. William T. Little, James S. Robles, N.L.R.B., Region 25, Indianapolis, Ind., for N.L.R.B. Kenneth J. Yerkes, Robert K. Bellamy (argued), Barnes Thornburg, Indianapolis, Ind., for Hill-Rom Co., Inc. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board

  5. Newspaper Printing Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    692 F.2d 615 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 15 times
    In Newspaper Printing, the employer did not merely reserve the right to assign work to another union, but also reserved the right unilaterally to determine what jobs were in the bargaining unit.
  6. General Electric Company v. N.L.R.B

    412 F.2d 512 (2d Cir. 1969)   Cited 30 times
    Upholding NLRB's determination that unions do not commit unfair labor practices by insisting that employer bargain with mixed-union negotiating committee
  7. University of Chicago v. N.L.R.B

    514 F.2d 942 (7th Cir. 1975)   Cited 15 times
    In Univ. of Chicago v. N.L.R.B., 514 F.2d 942 (7th Cir. 1975), the University had transferred custodial work from one bargaining unit to another after bargaining to impasse over the transfer.
  8. Standard Oil Company v. N.L.R.B

    322 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1963)   Cited 22 times
    In Standard Oil Co. v. NLRB, 322 F.2d 40 (6th Cir. 1963), four oil refineries of the same company constituted separate bargaining units; one was represented by an international union and the other three by locals thereof.
  9. Afl-Cio Joint Negotiating Com. for Phelps Dodge v. NLRB

    470 F.2d 722 (3d Cir. 1972)   Cited 3 times

    No. 19199. 03-31-1972 AFL-CIO JOINT NEGOTIATING COMMITTEE FOR PHELPS DODGE, etc., et al., Petitioners, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Phelps Dodge Corporation, Intervenor. Michael H. Gottesman, Bredhoff, Barr, Gottesman, Cohen & Peer, Washington, D. C., for petitioners. Eugene B. Granof, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for respondent. John F. Boland, Jr., Evans, Kitchel & Jenckes, Phoenix, Ariz., for intervenor. STALEY, ADAMS and MAX ROSENN, Circuit Michael H. Gottesman, Bredhoff, Barr

  10. N.L.R.B. v. S. Atl., Longshoremen's Ass'n

    443 F.2d 218 (5th Cir. 1971)   Cited 2 times

    No. 30968 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises, Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Co. of New York et al., 5 Cir., 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I. May 26, 1971. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Clifford Potter, Director, Region 23, N.L.R.B., Houston, Tex., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Thomas Silfen, Kenneth Pearlman, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for petitioner. Warner F. Brock, Houston, Tex., J.E. Williams

  11. Section 19-P:2 - Duties

    N.H. Rev. Stat. § 19-P:2   Cited 15 times

    The commission's duties shall include, but not be limited to: I. Reviewing and recommending proposals for rules, legislation, waivers, operations, and other policies. II. Reviewing and providing input relative to state planning efforts across agencies, including the state plan on aging, the mental health plan, and transportation and safety. III. Formulating or helping to formulate, reviewing, and evaluating policy proposals, considering fiscal, program, provider, and recipient impact, and making