§

Chicago Beef Co.

298 N.L.R.B. 1039 (N.L.R.B. 1990)
Chicago Beef Co.

14 Cited authorities

  1. Nassau County Repub. v. Cullen

    483 U.S. 1021 (1987)   Cited 380 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an entity may be both the liable "person" and part of the RICO "enterprise" where the enterprise consisted of more than the entity itself

  2. Labor Board v. Borg-Warner Corp.

    356 U.S. 342 (1958)   Cited 296 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding employer's insistence on a ballot clause was an unfair labor practice under § 8 because it was a non-mandatory subject of bargaining and it "substantially modifies the collective-bargaining system provided for in the statute by weakening the independence of the 'representative' chosen by the employees. It enables the employer, in effect, to deal with its employees rather than with their statutory representative."

  3. Village of Penn Yan v. New York State Electric & Gas Corp.

    454 U.S. 821 (1981)   Cited 40 times
    Holding that it is no search to use binoculars to see display of weapons in lighted office of gas station located on major thoroughfare in commercial district

  4. Soule Glass and Glazing Co. v. N.L.R.B

    652 F.2d 1055 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 97 times
    Holding that the employer "must bargain with respect to the decision to remove work from bargaining unit employees, not merely its effects on the employees"

  5. Industrial Un. of Mar. Ship. W. v. N.L.R.B

    320 F.2d 615 (3d Cir. 1963)   Cited 63 times   4 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 14052, 14102. Argued May 21, 1963. Decided July 30, 1963. M.H. Goldstein, Philadelphia, Pa. (Goldstein Barkan, Michael Brodie, Philadelphia, Pa., on the brief), for petitioner, Industrial Union of Marine and Shipbuilding Workers of America, AFL-CIO. John H. Morse, New York City (Frank Cummings, New York City, Cravath, Swaine Moore, New York City, on the brief), for Bethlehem Steel Co. (Shipbuilding Division). Nancy M. Sherman, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Burkart Foam, Inc.

    848 F.2d 825 (7th Cir. 1988)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that an employer’s unwillingness to deviate from its position kept the offer on the table

  7. Boise Cascade Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    860 F.2d 471 (D.C. Cir. 1988)   Cited 18 times
    Holding scope of the employees' bargaining unit is not a mandatory subject of bargaining

  8. The Idaho Statesman v. N.L.R.B

    836 F.2d 1396 (D.C. Cir. 1988)   Cited 17 times
    Stating that § 8 protects mandatory, but not permissive, subjects of bargaining

  9. Newspaper Printing Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    625 F.2d 956 (10th Cir. 1980)   Cited 24 times
    In Newspaper Printing Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 625 F.2d 956 (10th Cir. 1980), cert. denied 450 U.S. 911, 101 S.Ct. 1349, 67 L.Ed.2d 335 (1981), the newspaper and the union had a clause in the prior collective bargaining agreement similar if not identical to that of Article I Section 3 in the 1972-75 agreement in the present case.

  10. Latrobe Steel Co. v. N.L.R.B

    630 F.2d 171 (3d Cir. 1980)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that impasse is not the test under Borg-Warner

  11. Section 159 - Representatives and elections

    29 U.S.C. § 159   Cited 2,441 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Granting a bargaining unit the exclusive right to represent employees in it