§

Chester L. Krause v. Krause Publica-tions, Inc.

No. 92041171 (T.T.A.B. Nov. 18, 2005)
Chester L. Krause v. Krause Publica-tions, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. National Cable Television v. Am. Cinema

    937 F.2d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1991)   Cited 83 times
    Rejecting contention that “American Cinema Editors” did not have trademark rights in the acronym “ACE”

  2. Dovenmuehle v. Gilldorn Mortg. Midwest Corp.

    871 F.2d 697 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 59 times
    Holding seller of business containing his personal name did not retain a reasonable commercial interest to be protected from competitive harm

  3. Tuxedo Monopoly, Inc. v. General Mills Fun Group, Inc.

    648 F.2d 1335 (C.C.P.A. 1981)   Cited 10 times
    Finding extensive licensing of mark MONOPOLY for real estate game relevant evidence of relatedness of goods

  4. James Burrough Limited v. LaJoie

    462 F.2d 570 (C.C.P.A. 1972)   Cited 2 times

    Patent Appeal No. 8680. July 13, 1972. G. Cabell Busick, Washington, D.C. (Mason, Fenwick Lawrence), Washington, D.C., attorneys of record, for appellant; Lauterstein Lauterstein, New York City, of counsel. L. Gaylord Hulbert, Detroit, Mich. (Whittemore, Hulbert Belknap), Detroit, Mich., attorneys of record, for appellees; Joseph A. DeGrandi, Washington, D.C. (Browne, Beveridge DeGrandi), Washington, D.C., of counsel. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board. Before RICH, Acting Chief Judge

  5. Salem Commodities v. Miami Margarine Co.

    244 F.2d 729 (C.C.P.A. 1957)   Cited 14 times
    In Salem Commodities, Inc. v. Miami Margarine Co., 244 F.2d 729, 732, 114 USPQ 124, 126-27 (CCPA 1957), our predecessor court rejected the rationale that laches runs against a party from the date that party knew of the use of the mark by the applicant or registrant.

  6. Section 1052 - Trademarks registrable on principal register; concurrent registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1052   Cited 1,612 times   274 Legal Analyses
    Granting authority to refuse registration to a trademark that so resembles a registered mark "as to be likely, when used on or in connection with the goods of the applicant, to cause confusion, or to cause mistake, or to deceive"

  7. Section 1057 - Certificates of registration

    15 U.S.C. § 1057   Cited 1,054 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Providing that a certificate of registration is prima facie evidence of an owner's right to use the mark

  8. Section 1924 - Verification of bill of costs

    28 U.S.C. § 1924   Cited 412 times
    Requiring the prevailing party to file an affidavit declaring that the items sought are correct and "necessarily incurred"