§

Cheryl New, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

05960497 (E.E.O.C. Jan. 18, 2000)
Cheryl New, Complainant, v. William J. Henderson, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Agency.

4 Cited authorities

  1. Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc.

    527 U.S. 471 (1999)   Cited 2,897 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that " person whose physical or mental impairment is corrected by medication or other measures does not have an impairment that presently 'substantially limits' a major life activity."

  2. O'Connor v. Consolidated Coin Caterers Corp.

    517 U.S. 308 (1996)   Cited 2,070 times   7 Legal Analyses
    Holding that inference of age discrimination cannot be drawn from “replacement of one worker with another worker insignificantly younger”

  3. Albertsons, Inc. v. Kirkingburg

    527 U.S. 555 (1999)   Cited 680 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that although vision-impaired individuals may not have "an onerous burden" in demonstrating disability and "ordinarily will meet the [ADA]'s definition of disability," they must still offer evidence of "limitation in terms of their own experience"

  4. Murphy v. United Parcel Service, Inc.

    527 U.S. 516 (1999)   Cited 502 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "determination of [a person's] disability is made with reference to the mitigating measures he employs."