§
Chep USA

11 Cited authorities

  1. Wheat v. United States

    486 U.S. 153 (1988)   Cited 2,430 times   10 Legal Analyses
    Holding in multiple-representation cases, a district court must help protect criminal defendants against counsel’s conflict of interest

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 657 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  3. Labor Bd. v. Washington Aluminum Co.

    370 U.S. 9 (1962)   Cited 206 times   3 Legal Analyses
    Holding that certain employee conduct crosses the line from protected activity to "indefensible" conduct that loses NLRA protections

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  5. N.L.R.B. v. McCullough Environmental Serv

    5 F.3d 923 (5th Cir. 1993)   Cited 98 times
    Concluding that statement that "things were going to get a lot tougher around here" upon unionization constituted a threat

  6. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Caval Tool Division, Chromalloy Gas Turbine Corp.

    262 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2001)   Cited 20 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming the Board's holding that an employee engaged in concerted activity when he made statements about the company's new break policy at an employee meeting called by the employer to address the policy

  7. California Acrylic Industries, Inc. v. NLRB

    150 F.3d 1095 (9th Cir. 1998)   Cited 17 times
    Holding that surveillance can constitute "interference" in violation of the National Labor Relations Act ("NLRA"), which prohibits "interfer[ing] with, restrain[ing], or coercing employees in the exercise of the rights guaranteed" by the Act

  8. Cooper Tire Rubber Co. v. N.L.R.B

    957 F.2d 1245 (5th Cir. 1992)   Cited 10 times
    In Cooper Tire, 957 F.2d at 1250, the Fifth Circuit recognized the difficulty in terms such as "working time" and "work areas," but rejected the employer's argument that these difficulties justified a blanket prohibition on all soliciting except in the break room itself.

  9. Asociacion Hosp. Del Maestro, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    842 F.2d 575 (1st Cir. 1988)   Cited 4 times

    No. 87-1476. Heard December 7, 1987. Decided March 30, 1988. Roberto E. Vega-Pacheco with whom Roberto O. Maldonado Nieves and Cancio, Nadal Rivera, Hato Rey, P.R., were on brief, for petitioner. Howard E. Perlstein, Supervisory Atty., with whom Harriet Lipkin, Rosemary M. Collyer, General Counsel, John E. Higgins, Jr., Deputy General Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Petition

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Saint Vincent's Hosp

    729 F.2d 730 (11th Cir. 1984)   Cited 4 times

    No. 83-7203. April 9, 1984. Elliott Moore, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Peter M. Bernstein and Ellen A. Farrell, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harry L. Hopkins, Lang, Simpson, Robinson Sommerville, Birmingham, Ala., for respondent. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before GODBOLD, Chief Judge, RONEY and SMITH, Circuit Judges. Honorable Edward S. Smith, U.S. Circuit Judge for the Federal Circuit, sitting by designation. GODBOLD, Chief Judge: