§

Chelsea Industries, Inc.

331 N.L.R.B. 1648 (N.L.R.B. 2000)
Chelsea Industries, Inc.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    522 U.S. 359 (1998)   Cited 426 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"

  2. Fall River Dyeing & Finishing Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    482 U.S. 27 (1987)   Cited 369 times   12 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the new employer must bargain with the old union, if the new employer is a true successor, and discussing factors

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

    494 U.S. 775 (1990)   Cited 177 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

  4. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  5. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 781 (1996)   Cited 59 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"

  6. Rock-Tenn Co. v. N.L.R.B

    69 F.3d 803 (7th Cir. 1995)   Cited 14 times

    Nos. 95-1347 95-1706 ARGUED SEPTEMBER 8, 1995 DECIDED NOVEMBER 3, 1995 Larry E. Forrester (argued), James Chadwick Hatmaker, Atlanta, GA, for Rock-Tenn Company. Charles P. Donnelly, Jr., National Labor Relations Board, Contempt Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, Aileen A. Armstrong, John D. Burgoyne (argued), Steven F. Rappaport, National Labor Relations Board, Appellate Court, Enforcement Litigation, Washington, DC, William T. Little, National Labor Relations Board, Region 25, Indianapolis, IN,

  7. United Supermarkets, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    862 F.2d 549 (5th Cir. 1989)   Cited 16 times   1 Legal Analyses

    No. 88-4027. January 3, 1989. Don Graf, Dan G. Young, McCleskey, Harriger, Brazill Graf, Lubbock, Tex., for petitioner cross-respondent. Wm. M. Bernstein, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Aileen A. Armstrong, Barbara A. Atkin, Washington, D.C., Michael Dunn, Regional Director, NLRB, Edward B. Valverde, Fort Worth, Tex., for NLRB. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before WILLIAMS and GARWOOD, Circuit Judges, and POLOZOLA,

  8. Van Dorn Plastic Machinery Co. v. N.L.R.B

    939 F.2d 402 (6th Cir. 1991)   Cited 4 times

    Nos. 90-6340, 90-6539. Argued July 18, 1991. Decided August 5, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied September 18, 1991. Keith A. Ashmus (argued), Carl H. Gluek, Thompson, Hine Flory, Cleveland, Ohio, for petitioner, cross-respondent. Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Charles P. Donnelly, Jr., John C. Truesdale, Executive Secretary, Margaret E. Luke (argued), N.L.R.B., Office of the Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., Frederick Calatrello, Director, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent