§

Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Etc., "General" Local No. 200

126 N.L.R.B. 650 (N.L.R.B. 1960)
Chauffeurs, Teamsters, Etc., "General" Local No. 200

5 Cited authorities

  1. Carpenters' Union v. Labor Board

    357 U.S. 93 (1958)   Cited 201 times
    Rejecting Government position that we should defer to the Board's interpretation of the Interstate Commerce Act

  2. Labor Board v. Rice Milling Co.

    341 U.S. 665 (1951)   Cited 126 times
    Noting that section 8(b) was intended to preserve "the right of labor organizations to bring pressure to bear on offending employers in primary labor disputes"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bus. Mach

    228 F.2d 553 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 67 times
    In National Labor Relations Bd. v. Business Mach. etc., CIO (228 F.2d 553) the Circuit Court of Appeals for this circuit declared (p. 559) that "The only thing proscribed by § 8(b)(4) is inducement or encouragement of the employees of the customers".

  4. Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, Ect.

    75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948)   Cited 51 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In Douds v. Metropolitan Federation of Architects, etc., 75 F. Supp. 672 (S.D.N.Y. 1948), the court laid heavy emphasis on the economic effect of the work performed by the ally's employees.

  5. Meier Pohlmann Furniture Company v. Gibbons

    233 F.2d 296 (8th Cir. 1956)   Cited 12 times

    No. 15402. April 26, 1956. Rehearing Denied May 23, 1956. Thomas Rowe Schwarz, St. Louis, Mo. (Fordyce, Mayne, Hartman, Renard Stribling, St. Louis, Mo., was with him on the brief), for appellant. Gregory M. Rebman and Harold I. Elbert, St. Louis, Mo., for appellees. LaTourette Rebman and Gregory M. Rebman, St. Louis, Mo., were on the brief for appellees Anderson Motor Service, Inc., Hussman Roper Freight Lines, Inc., Lovelace Truck Service, L.A. Tucker Truck Lines, Inc., and Consolidated Forwarding