§

Charter Communications

366 NLRB No. 46 (N.L.R.B. 2018)
Charter Communications

10 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Transportation Management Corp.

    462 U.S. 393 (1983)   Cited 652 times   11 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the employer bears the burden of negating causation in a mixed-motive discrimination case, noting "[i]t is fair that [the employer] bear the risk that the influence of legal and illegal motives cannot be separated."

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 357 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act

  3. Cellular Sales of Missouri, LLC v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    824 F.3d 772 (8th Cir. 2016)   Cited 40 times   18 Legal Analyses
    Holding that an arbitration agreement providing that "[a]ll claims, disputes or controversies ... shall be decided by [individual] arbitration" violated Section 8 given its "breadth and generality" and "the absence of any limits to this broadly worded provision"

  4. W.F. Bolin Co. v. N.L.R.B

    70 F.3d 863 (6th Cir. 1995)   Cited 48 times
    Holding that an "inference of improper employer motivation" is permitted when an employer has terminated an employee who acted as a leader in making complaints to management on behalf of himself or others, or has organized workers on employment issues

  5. Caterpillar Logistics, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    835 F.3d 536 (6th Cir. 2016)   Cited 12 times

    Nos. 15–1433/1611 07-19-2016 Caterpillar Logistics, Inc., Petitioner/Cross–Respondent, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent/Cross–Petitioner, International Union, United Automobile, Aerospace and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Intervening Respondent. ARGUED: Joseph J. Torres, Winston & Strawn LLP, Chicago, Illinois, for Petitioner/Cross–Respondent. Valerie L. Collins, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for Respondent/Cross–Petitioner. Kristin Seifert Watson, Cloppert

  6. Remington Lodging & Hospitality, L.L.C. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    847 F.3d 180 (5th Cir. 2017)   Cited 5 times

    No. 16-60106 01-27-2017 REMINGTON LODGING & HOSPITALITY, L.L.C., Petitioner Cross–Respondent v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent Cross–Petitioner Karl M. Terrell, Stokes Wagner Hunt Maretz & Terrell, A.L.C., Atlanta, GA, for Petitioner Cross–Respondent. Linda Dreeben, Esq., Deputy Associate General Counsel, David Casserly, Richard F. Griffin, Jr., Elizabeth Ann Heaney, Esq., National Labor Relations Board, Appellate & Supreme Court Litigation Branch, Washington, DC, James G. Paulsen, National

  7. Hotel Emp. Restaurant Emp. Un. v. N.L.R.B

    760 F.2d 1006 (9th Cir. 1985)   Cited 26 times   6 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Rossmore House, 269 NLRB 1176

  8. Holsum de Puerto Rico, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    456 F.3d 265 (1st Cir. 2006)   Cited 3 times
    Finding substantial evidence of knowledge of union activities conducted in plain view in an open parking lot where the activities "could very well have been observed by any number of supervisors and managers"

  9. N.L.R.B. v. Limestone Apparel Corp.

    705 F.2d 799 (6th Cir. 1982)   Cited 3 times

    No. 81-1693. October 29, 1982. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jacob Oliner, Oliner Oliner, New York City, for respondent. Petition to Enforce an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before LIVELY, KRUPANSKY and WELLFORD, Circuit Judges. ORDER This cause comes before the Court upon the motion of the intervenor, International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, for an order enforcing the order of the National Labor Relations Board in Limestone

  10. Dillingham Marine Mfg. Co., Etc. v. N.L.R.B

    610 F.2d 319 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 5 times

    No. 79-1029. January 24, 1980. Threadgill Smith, Taylor B. Smith, Columbus, Miss., for petitioner cross-respondent. Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Edward S. Dorsey, Atty. N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent cross-petitioner. On Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before AINSWORTH, VANCE and ANDERSON, Circuit Judges. R. LANIER ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: This case comes before us for review of the Decision