§

Charm Step Shoes

245 N.L.R.B. 1234 (N.L.R.B. 1979)
Charm Step Shoes

8 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Laughlin

    301 U.S. 1 (1937)   Cited 1,499 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the National Labor Relations Act applied only to interstate commerce, and upholding its constitutionality on that basis

  2. Shattuck Denn Mining Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    362 F.2d 466 (9th Cir. 1966)   Cited 56 times
    Upholding Board's determination that discharge for insubordination was pretextual where employer "refused to discharge" another employee also accused of insubordination

  3. Mushroom Transportation Company v. N.L.R.B

    330 F.2d 683 (3d Cir. 1964)   Cited 48 times
    In Mushroom Transportation Co. v. NLRB, 330 F.2d 683, 685 (3d Cir. 1964), we held that to qualify as concerted activity "it must appear at the very least that [the conduct] was engaged in with the object of initiating or inducing or preparing for group action or that it had some relation to group action in the interest of the employees."

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ace Comb Co.

    342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965)   Cited 32 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Ace Comb Co., 342 F.2d 841 (8th Cir. 1965) and N.L.R.B. v. Bird Machine Co., 161 F.2d 589 (1st Cir. 1947), where instructions to supervisory employees not to make coercive statements did not relieve employer of imputed liability it is indicated that it might be otherwise if these instructions had been communicated to the employees.

  5. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Tex-O-Kan F. Mills

    122 F.2d 433 (5th Cir. 1941)   Cited 60 times
    In NLRB v. Tex-O-Kan Flour Mills Co., 122 F.2d 433 (5th Cir. 1941) the Fifth Circuit stated that the employer's sworn denial of anti-union animus in discharging employees could not be disregarded merely on suspicion that he may be lying unless there is substantial impeachment or contradiction of him.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. South Rambler Company

    324 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963)   Cited 19 times

    No. 17301. November 20, 1963. Arthur M. Goldberg, Atty., N.L.R.B., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Warren M. Davison, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for the National Labor Relations Board. John E. Tate, Omaha, Neb., for respondent. Before MATTHES and MEHAFFY, Circuit Judges, and MICKELSON, District Judge. MATTHES, Circuit Judge. This case is before the court upon petition of the National Labor Relations Board

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Walton Manufacturing Company

    286 F.2d 16 (5th Cir. 1961)   Cited 20 times
    In Walton the court said only that "The requirements of substantiality of evidence and reasonableness of the inferences to be drawn from the evidence are not less in a case of reinstatement and reimbursement than where a cease and desist order is directed against interference" — not that the requirements are more strict.

  8. United States v. Haynes

    233 F.2d 413 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 9 times

    No. 15655. April 20, 1956. Harlan Pomeroy, Trial Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., James W. Dorsey, U.S. Atty., Slaton Clemmons, Asst. U.S. Atty., Atlanta, Ga., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., Charles D. Read, Jr., Asst. U.S. Attys., Atlanta, Ga., H. Brian Holland, Asst. Atty. Gen., Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellant. John H. Hudson, William Ralph Hudson, Atlanta, Ga., Thomas E. Berry, Houston, Tex., for appellees. Before BORAH, TUTTLE