Charley Toppino and Sons, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

Phelps Dodge Corp. v. Labor Board
313 U.S. 177 (1941) Cited 871 times
Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand, Inc.
94 F.2d 862 (2d Cir. 1938) Cited 178 times
In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.
N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc.
311 F.2d 447 (8th Cir. 1963) Cited 71 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.
Nabors v. N.L.R.B
323 F.2d 686 (5th Cir. 1963) Cited 59 times
Holding that NLRB acts in public capacity and “[t]he fact that these proceedings operate to confer an incidental benefit on private persons does not detract from this public purpose”
N.L.R.B. v. Ozark Hardwood Company
282 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1960) Cited 35 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Ozark Hardwood Co., 282 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1960), the 8th Circuit also indicated that courts of appeals could make successorship determinations.
National Labor Relations Bd. v. Remington Rand
130 F.2d 919 (2d Cir. 1942) Cited 51 times
In N.L.R.B. v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 130 F.2d 919, 925, we held that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, rule 53(e)(2), 28 U.S.C.A. — which provides that a Master's findings stand unless clearly erroneous — would be applicable, by analogy, to findings of a Master appointed by a court of appeals.
N.L.R.B. v. Biscayne Television Corporation
337 F.2d 267 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 9 times
No. 18452. October 12, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., Washington, D.C., Harold A. Boire, Director, Tampa, Fla., for petitioner. Jerry B. Crockett, Miami, Fla., for respondent. Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, BELL, Circuit Judge, and WHITEHURST, District Judge. PER CURIAM. This case is before the court on a petition by the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its supplemental order issued upon the remand
N.L.R.B. v. Charley Toppino and Sons, Inc.
332 F.2d 85 (5th Cir. 1964) Cited 9 times
No. 20522. May 20, 1964. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, James McConnell Harkless, Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Ray C. Muller, Fisher Phillips, Atlanta, Ga., for respondent. Before RIVES, Circuit Judge, and HUNTER, District Judge. Sitting by designation. Cameron, Circuit Judge, also participated in the hearing and consideration of this case but died on April 3, 1964, before its
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Reed & Prince Mfg. Co.
130 F.2d 765 (1st Cir. 1942) Cited 10 times
No. 3549. September 16, 1942. Petition for an Order to Show Cause and an Order to Adjust in Contempt. Petition by the National Labor Relations Board to have the Reed Prince Manufacturing Company and certain of its officers adjudged in contempt of court. Order in accordance with opinion. Robert B. Watts, Gen. Counsel, and Ernest A. Gross, Associate Gen. Counsel, both of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Jay Clark, Jr., and George H. Mason, both of Worcester, Mass., for respondent. Before MAGRUDER
Salmon Cowin v. National Labor Relations Bd.
148 F.2d 941 (5th Cir. 1945) Cited 1 times
No. 11138. April 30, 1945. Rehearing Denied June 1, 1945. Petition for Review of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board, sitting at Washington, D.C. Petition of Salmon Corwin, Inc., Mining Engineers and Contractors, to review that portion of a cease and desist order of the National Labor Relations Board requiring petitioner to reinstate a discharged employee, wherein the National Labor Relations Board filed a cross-petition for enforcement in full of its orders against petitioner and Mine

Charley Toppino and Sons, Inc.

11 Cited authorities

Holding that the NLRA limits the Board's backpay authority to restoring “actual losses”

In National Labor Relations Board v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 94 F.2d 862, 869, the Board had ordered the employer to deal exclusively with a joint board which had brought the unfair labor practice charges involved in that case.

In N.L.R.B. v. Brown Root, Inc., 311 F.2d 447, 454 (C.A. 8), it is said that "in a back pay proceeding the burden is upon the General Counsel to show the gross amounts of back pay due.

Holding that NLRB acts in public capacity and “[t]he fact that these proceedings operate to confer an incidental benefit on private persons does not detract from this public purpose”

In N.L.R.B. v. Ozark Hardwood Co., 282 F.2d 1 (8th Cir. 1960), the 8th Circuit also indicated that courts of appeals could make successorship determinations.

In N.L.R.B. v. Remington Rand, 2 Cir., 130 F.2d 919, 925, we held that Federal Rule of Civil Procedure, rule 53(e)(2), 28 U.S.C.A. — which provides that a Master's findings stand unless clearly erroneous — would be applicable, by analogy, to findings of a Master appointed by a court of appeals.