5 Cited authorities
Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.
321 U.S. 678 (1944) Cited 270 times 1 Legal AnalysesHolding that offers of benefits to union supporters that induce them to leave the union violate ยง 8
Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board
321 U.S. 702 (1944) Cited 252 times 1 Legal AnalysesRecognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.
Southport Pet., Co. v. N.L.R.B
315 U.S. 100 (1942) Cited 187 timesRuling that dissolution of company and transfer of assets did not prevent enforcement of a Board order
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Universal Camera
190 F.2d 429 (2d Cir. 1951) Cited 52 timesNo. 21395. Argued June 14, 1951. Decided July 13, 1951. Before SWAN, Chief Judge, and FRANK and L. HAND, Circuit Judges. Mozart G. Ratner, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. Frederick R. Livingston, New York City, for the respondent. L. HAND, Circuit Judge. By a divided vote we decided this appeal last year upon the same record that is now before us, holding that the Board's order should be "enforced." The Supreme Court vacated our order and remanded the cause to us for reconsideration in two
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Everett Van Kleeck
189 F.2d 516 (2d Cir. 1951) Cited 3 timesNo. 202, Docket 21903. Argued May 8, 1951. Decided May 31, 1951. George P. Bott, General Counsel, David P. Findling, Associate General Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Assistant General Counsel, Harvey B. Diamond and George H. Plaut, Attorneys, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C., for the petitioner. Adolph Bangser, New York City, for respondent. Before SWAN, AUGUSTUS N. HAND and CLARK, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. The decision and order under review affirms the Trial Examiner's conclusion