§

CHAPIN HILL @ RED BANK

360 N.L.R.B. 116 (N.L.R.B. 2014)
CHAPIN HILL @ RED BANK

7 Cited authorities

  1. New Process Steel v. N.L.R.B.

    560 U.S. 674 (2010)   Cited 141 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board cannot exercise its powers absent a lawfully appointed quorum

  2. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB erred in requiring employer to disclose performance test scores of employees as information for collective bargaining, regardless of employee consent, because of the sensitive nature of the test scores

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  4. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    288 F.3d 434 (D.C. Cir. 2002)   Cited 12 times
    Noting that relevant information requests are presumed to have been made in good faith "until the company demonstrates otherwise"

  6. C-B Buick, Incorporated v. N.L.R.B

    506 F.2d 1086 (3d Cir. 1974)   Cited 29 times

    No. 73-2068. Argued September 6, 1974. Decided November 14, 1974. H. David Rothman, Pittsburgh, Pa., for petitioner. William H. DuRoss, III, Atty., Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, John S. Irving, Deputy Gen. Counsel, Patrick Hardin, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before SEITZ, Chief Judge, and GIBBONS and GARTH, Circuit Judges. OPINION OF THE COURT GARTH, Circuit Judge

  7. International Tel. and Tel. Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    382 F.2d 366 (3d Cir. 1967)   Cited 30 times
    Finding that a mixed unit of professional and non-professional employees, though frowned upon within section 9 of the Act, was still protected by section 8's bargaining requirement