§

Chambersburg County Market

293 N.L.R.B. 654 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
Chambersburg County Market

14 Cited authorities

  1. Machinists Local v. Labor Board

    362 U.S. 411 (1960)   Cited 276 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that “a finding of violation which is inescapably grounded on events predating the limitations period” is untimely

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Strong

    393 U.S. 357 (1969)   Cited 115 times
    Explaining that, though broad, the NLRA's grant of remedial power "does not authorize punitive measures"

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Al Bryant, Inc.

    711 F.2d 543 (3d Cir. 1983)   Cited 62 times
    Finding that "the frequent interchange of craftsman" between the two companies is "substantial evidence to support" centralized labor relations control

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Donkin's Inn, Inc.

    532 F.2d 138 (9th Cir. 1976)   Cited 41 times

    No. 74-3252. March 4, 1976. Rehearing Denied April 28, 1976. Edmund Cooke, Atty. (argued), NLRB, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Robert S. Rose (argued), of Harris Aranda, Marina Del Rey, Cal., for respondent. Before CHAMBERS, TRASK and WALLACE, Circuit Judges. OPINION TRASK, Circuit Judge: This is an application for Enforcement of an Order of the NLRB, issued on October 9, 1974, against Donkin's Inn, Inc. (hereafter, "the Company") for certain violations of sections 8(a)(5) and 8(a)(1) of the

  5. J. Ray McDermott Co., Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    571 F.2d 850 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 34 times
    In J. Ray McDermott Co. v. NLRB, 571 F.2d 850, 858 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 439 U.S. 893, 99 S.Ct. 250, 58 L.Ed.2d 238 (1978), for example, the court held that the passage of more than six months from one refusal to bargain does not bar action by the Board on a timely complaint based on subsequent refusal.

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Basic Wire Products, Inc.

    516 F.2d 261 (6th Cir. 1975)   Cited 26 times
    Stating that the NLRB "properly refused to invalidate the election or to hold a hearing on the allegations" of election abuses where "[t]he only evidence proffered by [employer] was an affidavit of its Vice President to the effect that `union people' told several employees `that it would pay to support the Union'"

  7. International Un., United A., A. v. N.L.R.B

    363 F.2d 702 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 34 times
    Rejecting argument NLRB used section 8(c) protected statements as "as some evidence of the unfair labor practices themselves" and concluding statements were used only to "place . . . other acts in context"

  8. Pinnacle Books v. Harlequin Enterprises LTD

    661 F.2d 910 (2d Cir. 1981)   Cited 13 times

    No. 81-7379. June 18, 1981. Appeal from S.D.N.Y. DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS AFFIRMED

  9. N.L.R.B. v. McCready and Sons, Inc.

    482 F.2d 872 (6th Cir. 1973)   Cited 16 times

    No. 72-1320. Argued October 16, 1972. Decided June 29, 1973. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Jerome H. Brooks, Director Region 7, N.L.R.B., Detroit, Mich., Robert A. Giannasi, N.L.R.B., for petitioner-appellant; Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Stephen J. Solomon, Allen H. Feldman, Attys., N.L.R.B., on brief. Craig A. Miller, Kalamazoo, Mich., for respondents-appellees; Gemrich, Moser, Dombrowski, Bowser Garvey by Craig A. Miller, Kalamazoo, Mich., on brief for

  10. N.L.R.B. v. Preston H. Haskell Co.

    616 F.2d 136 (5th Cir. 1980)   Cited 9 times
    In NLRB v. Preston H. Haskell Co., 616 F.2d 136 (5th Cir. 1980), the panel filed three separate opinions, and two of those opinions expressly reject the argument Dependable makes here.