§

Chambers Manufacturing Corp.

124 N.L.R.B. 721 (N.L.R.B. 1959)
Chambers Manufacturing Corp.

10 Cited authorities

  1. Franks Bros. Co. v. Labor Board

    321 U.S. 702 (1944)   Cited 252 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing the legitimacy of the Board's view that the unlawful refusal to bargain collectively with employees' chosen representative disrupts employee morale, deters organizational activities, and discourages membership in unions.

  2. Labor Board v. Crompton Mills

    337 U.S. 217 (1949)   Cited 102 times
    Holding unlawful unilateral changes significantly different from "any which the employer has proposed" during bargaining

  3. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Globe Wireless

    193 F.2d 748 (9th Cir. 1951)   Cited 42 times

    No. 12736. December 27, 1951. George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, David P. Findling, Asso. Gen. Counsel, A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Frederick U. Reel, Albert M. Dreyer, Attorneys, NL RB, all of Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Gregory A. Harrison, Richard Ernst, Malcolm T. Dungan and Brobeck, Phleger Harrison, all of San Francisco, Cal., for respondent. Before HEALY and POPE, Circuit Judges and LEMMON, District Judge. HEALY, Circuit Judge. This matter is before us on petition of the National

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Kohler Company

    220 F.2d 3 (7th Cir. 1955)   Cited 30 times

    Nos. 11272, 11283. March 7, 1955. Rehearing Denied April 7, 1955. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Irving M. Herman, Atty., George J. Bott, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Samuel M. Singer, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for National Labor Relations Board. William F. Howe, Washington, D.C., Lyman C. Conger, Edward J. Hammer, Kohler, Wis., Jerome Powell, Gall, Lane Howe, Washington, D.C., for Kohler Co. Max Raskin, Milwaukee, Wis., David Rabinovitz, Sheboygan

  5. Armstrong Cork Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954)   Cited 27 times
    In Armstrong Cork Co. v. NLRB, 211 F.2d 843 (5th Cir. 1954), an employer announced to an assembly of workers shortly after a representation election that he intended to remove a "pledge" which the Company had posted on the bulletin board setting forth employees' rights.

  6. White v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    255 F.2d 564 (5th Cir. 1958)   Cited 18 times
    In White v. NLRB, 255 F.2d 564, 565 (5th Cir. 1958), five of sixty employees were granted raises, all before bargaining commenced following certification.

  7. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. United States Cold Storage Corp.

    203 F.2d 924 (5th Cir. 1953)   Cited 20 times
    Holding that an employer who insists on negotiating by mail or that a union submit its proposals in writing has unlawfully refused to bargain

  8. National Labor Rel. Board v. Anchor Rome Mills

    228 F.2d 775 (5th Cir. 1956)   Cited 11 times
    In National Labor Relations Board v. Anchor Rome Mills, supra, 228 F.2d 775, the Board had found a discriminatory failure to reemploy 35 former strikers.

  9. Mitchell v. Miller Drugs

    255 F.2d 574 (1st Cir. 1958)   Cited 8 times
    In Mitchell v. Miller Drugs, Inc., 1 Cir., 255 F.2d 574, 576, the court rejected defendant's contention that its three retail outlets constituted one establishment because of the realities attendant to its method of doing business.

  10. Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    222 F.2d 938 (1st Cir. 1955)   Cited 8 times

    No. 4911. June 6, 1955. Allan A. Tepper, Boston, Mass., with whom Snyder Tepper, Boston, Mass., was on brief, for petitioner. John Francis Lawless, Washington, D.C., with whom David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, and Arnold Ordman, Atty., Washington, D.C., were on brief, for respondent. Before MAGRUDER, Chief Judge, and WOODBURY and HARTIGAN, Circuit Judges. HARTIGAN, Circuit Judge. The petitioner, Lloyd A. Fry Roofing Company, pursuant to Sec. 10(f)