Certain-Teed Products Corp.
3 Cited authorities
Joy Silk Mills v. National Labor Rel. Board
185 F.2d 732 (D.C. Cir. 1950) Cited 162 times 2 Legal AnalysesIn Joy Silk the Court held that when an employer could have no doubt as to the majority status or when an employer refuses recognition of a union "due to a desire to gain time and to take action to dissipate the union's majority, the refusal is no longer justifiable and constitutes a violation of the duty to bargain set forth in section 8(a)(5) of the Act".
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. McGahey
233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956) Cited 133 timesIn N.L.R.B. v. McGahey, 233 F.2d 406 (5th Cir. 1956), this court described casual and moderate inquiries, even as to union preference, absent evidence indicating that the employee has reason to consider the inquiries a threat of reprisals, as not constituting an unfair labor practice in violation of § 8(a)(1).
Steel Industries, Incorporated v. N.L.R.B
325 F.2d 173 (7th Cir. 1963) Cited 8 timesNo. 13975. November 27, 1963. As Corrected November 27, 1963. Charles L. Whistler, Indianapolis, Ind., Joseph B. Carney, Indianapolis, Ind., Baker Daniels, Indianapolis, Ind., of counsel, for petitioner. Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Jules H. Gordon, Attorney, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Arnold Ordman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, Lee Modjeska, Attorney, N.L.R.B., for respondent. Before HASTINGS, Chief Judge, and DUFFY and MAJOR, Circuit Judges. MAJOR