§

Certain-Teed Corp.

271 N.L.R.B. 76 (N.L.R.B. 1984)
Certain-Teed Corp.

8 Cited authorities

  1. Bradley v. Richmond School Board

    416 U.S. 696 (1974)   Cited 1,464 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an appellate court must apply the law in effect at the time it renders its decision," unless such application would work a manifest injustice or there is statutory direction or legislative history to the contrary

  2. Securities Comm'n v. Chenery Corp.

    332 U.S. 194 (1947)   Cited 4,198 times   14 Legal Analyses
    Holding that if the agency rests its decision on "grounds are inadequate or improper, the court is powerless to affirm the administrative action by substituting what it considers to be a more adequate or proper basis"

  3. N.L.R.B. v. Semco Printing Center, Inc.

    721 F.2d 886 (2d Cir. 1983)   Cited 24 times
    Holding that where witness has put precise language in doubt, the trier of fact is entitled to consider all of the witness' recollections

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Monark Boat Co.

    713 F.2d 355 (8th Cir. 1983)   Cited 23 times
    Considering de novo whether objections alleging pre-election misconduct created substantial and material factual issues

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Rolligon Corp.

    702 F.2d 589 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 15 times
    Applying Riveredge Hospital gloss on Midland

  6. Certainteed Corp. v. N.L.R.B

    714 F.2d 1042 (11th Cir. 1983)   Cited 13 times
    In Certainteed Corp. v. N.L.R.B., 714 F.2d 1042, 1052-1060 (11th Cir. 1983), the court approved both Midland and its general retroactive application, but balked at resolving whether to apply the doctrine retroactively to the case before it, which had been decided by the Board under the Hollywood Ceramics/General Knit standard.

  7. N.L.R.B. v. New Columbus Nursing Home, Inc.

    720 F.2d 726 (1st Cir. 1983)   Cited 12 times
    In New Columbus, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit noted that "[s]ome misrepresentations may be so material and fraudulent as to undermine the employees' freedom of choice, rendering their section 7 right to self-organization a nullity."

  8. National Posters, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    720 F.2d 1358 (4th Cir. 1983)   Cited 7 times
    In National Posters Inc. v. N.L.R.B., 720 F.2d 1358 (4th Cir. 1983) ("National Posters I"), we vacated the NLRB's December 10th bargaining order because the NLRB's Regional Director rejected NPI's challenge to John's ballot without affording NPI the opportunity for a hearing on the underlying factual issues.