Central Storage and Transfer Co. of Harrisburg

9 Cited authorities

  1. Emporium Capwell Co. v. Western Addition Community Organization

    420 U.S. 50 (1975)   Cited 125 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that wildcat strikers are bargaining separately and are therefore not protected by the NLRA
  2. Labor Board v. Electrical Workers

    346 U.S. 464 (1953)   Cited 125 times   41 Legal Analyses
    Upholding discharge where employees publicly disparaged quality of employer's product, with no discernible relationship to pending labor dispute
  3. Labor Board v. Sands Mfg. Co.

    306 U.S. 332 (1939)   Cited 139 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Sands Mfg. Co., 306 U.S. 332, 59 S.Ct. 508, 83 L.Ed. 682, affirming the ruling of this Court in 6 Cir., 96 F.2d 721, the Supreme Court held the employer justified in abandoning further negotiations with the Union when conditions showed the uselessness of continuing with them.
  4. Mitchell v. Tribune Company

    342 U.S. 919 (1952)   Cited 90 times
    Employing the "target area" approach
  5. N.L.R.B. v. J. S. Alberici Const. Co., Inc.

    591 F.2d 463 (8th Cir. 1979)   Cited 16 times
    Finding of discriminatory refusal to hire; court stated that question whether the company would have hired discriminatee on subsequent jobs is one for compliance proceeding
  6. N.L.R.B. v. Shawnee Industries, Inc.

    333 F.2d 221 (10th Cir. 1964)   Cited 23 times
    Holding promulgation of an overly broad rule without enforcement not illegal under the special circumstances presented
  7. National Labor Rel. Board v. Nu-Car Carriers

    189 F.2d 756 (3d Cir. 1951)   Cited 26 times
    In N.L.R.B. v. Nu-Car Carriers, Inc., 189 F.2d 756 (3rd Cir. 1951), cert. den., 342 U.S. 919, 72 S.Ct. 367, 96 L.Ed. 687 (1952), workers who leased tractors from a corporation were held to be employees, on the grounds that express contractual provisions placing the workers under the direction and supervision of the corporation were enforced by supervisors who checked up on the quality of their driving, discharged, and at times assigned routes to the workers.
  8. National Labor Relations Bd. v. Furriers Joint Council of N.Y.

    224 F.2d 78 (2d Cir. 1955)   Cited 5 times

    No. 214, Docket 23250. Argued March 8, 1955. Decided June 21, 1955. David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Arnold Ordman and Elizabeth Head, Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Harold I. Cammer, New York City, for respondent. Before MEDINA and HINCKS, Circuit Judges, and BURKE, District Judge. BURKE, District Judge. This is an application of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of an order issued June 28, 1954 against respondent Union, following

  9. Rule 408 - Compromise Offers and Negotiations

    Fed. R. Evid. 408   Cited 4,421 times   49 Legal Analyses
    Holding that premature deliberations constituted an internal jury influence subject to the post-verdict restrictions of Rule 606(b)