§

Central Pennsylvania Regional Council of Carpenters

337 N.L.R.B. 1030 (N.L.R.B. 2002)
Central Pennsylvania Regional Council of Carpenters

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Enterprise Ass'n of Steam, Hot Water, Hydraulic Sprinkler, Pneumatic Tube, Ice Machine & General Pipefitters

    429 U.S. 507 (1977)   Cited 138 times
    Stating that if a union were to attempt to capture work it had previously acquiesced to non-union workers' performing, such conduct would serve "not to preserve, but to aggrandize, its own position and that of its members," concluding that "[s]uch activity is squarely within the statute" and thus prohibited

  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. International Longshoremen's Ass'n

    447 U.S. 490 (1980)   Cited 65 times   4 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Longshoremen, 447 U.S. 490 (1980) (ILA I), we reviewed the National Labor Relations Board's conclusion that the Rules and their enforcement constituted unlawful secondary activity under §§ 8(b)(4)(B) and 8(e) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 158(b)(4) (B) and 158(e).

  3. Shepard v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    459 U.S. 344 (1983)   Cited 44 times
    Concluding that "§ 303 provides a remedy only for violations of § 8(b) of the Act, which, in turn, requires proof of coercion"

  4. Danielson v. Int'l Or. of Mast., M. P

    521 F.2d 747 (2d Cir. 1975)   Cited 29 times
    Discussing standards for § 10( l) injunction

  5. Carrier Air Conditioning Co. v. N.L.R.B

    547 F.2d 1178 (2d Cir. 1976)   Cited 24 times
    Finding that threat by union to enforce no-subcontracting clause through use of contractual grievance procedure was coercive

  6. Building Material v. N.L.R.B

    669 F.2d 759 (D.C. Cir. 1981)   Cited 13 times
    Noting that agency principles require examination of all aspects of the relationship

  7. Joint Council of Teamsters No. 42 v. N.L.R.B

    450 F.2d 1322 (D.C. Cir. 1971)   Cited 18 times   1 Legal Analyses

    Nos. 24016, 24261. Argued March 2, 1971. Decided September 24, 1971. Mr. Paul Crost, Los Angeles, Cal., of the bar of the Supreme Court of California, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court, with whom Mr. Raymond W. Bergan, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioners in No. 24,016 and intervenors in No. 24,261. Mr. George A. Pappy, Los Angeles, Cal., also entered an appearance for petitioners in No. 24,016 and intervenors in No. 24,261. Mr. Carl W. Robertson, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner

  8. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 28, Sheet Metal Workers' International Ass'n

    380 F.2d 827 (2d Cir. 1967)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 200, 201, Dockets 30563, 30564. Argued November 22, 1966. Decided July 10, 1967. Gary Green, Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, National Labor Relations Board, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C.), for petitioner. Samuel Harris Cohen, New York City (Leonard Leibowitz and Cohn Glickstein, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before WATERMAN, MOORE and HAYS, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: The National

  9. Los Angeles Mailers Union No. 9, v. N.L.R.B

    311 F.2d 121 (D.C. Cir. 1962)   Cited 16 times

    No. 16887. Argued September 27, 1962. Decided October 25, 1962. Rehearing Denied December 6, 1962. Mr. George Kaufmann, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Washington, D.C., and Stephen Reinhardt, Los Angeles, Cal., were on the brief, for petitioner. Mr. Hans J. Lehmann, Attorney, National Labor Relations Board, with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, General Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate General Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. General Counsel, National Labor Relations