§
Central Markets

2 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Parts Co.

    375 U.S. 405 (1964)   Cited 213 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Act “prohibits not only intrusive threats and promises but also conduct immediately favorable to employees which is undertaken with the express purpose of impinging upon their freedom of choice for or against unionization and is reasonably calculated to have that effect.”

  2. N.L.R.B. v. Miller

    341 F.2d 870 (2d Cir. 1965)   Cited 15 times

    Nos. 274, 306, Dockets 29186, 29296. Argued January 6, 1965. Decided March 1, 1965. Elliott Moore, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C. (Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B.), for petitioner. Sanford H. Markham, New York City (Michael P. Graff, New York City, on the brief), for respondents. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and WATERMAN and HAYS, Circuit Judges. HAYS, Circuit Judge: The National Labor Relations Board