§

C.E.K. Industrial Mechanical Contractors, Inc., Cam-Ful Industries, Inc.

295 N.L.R.B. 635 (N.L.R.B. 1989)
C.E.K. Industrial Mechanical Contractors, Inc., Cam-Ful Industries, Inc.

6 Cited authorities

  1. Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

    380 U.S. 255 (1965)   Cited 326 times
    Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act

  2. South Prairie Constr. v. Operating Engineers

    425 U.S. 800 (1976)   Cited 222 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that appeals court usurped role of NLRB by reversing Board's legal conclusion and proceeding to decide issue of fact that should be decided by Board in the first instance

  3. International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers, Local 3 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    843 F.2d 770 (3d Cir. 1988)   Cited 119 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding review of the Board's decision to apply a new rule of law retrospectively is deferential and that the Board's ruling will be disturbed only if it wreaks manifest injustice

  4. N.L.R.B. v. Don Burgess Const. Corp.

    596 F.2d 378 (9th Cir. 1979)   Cited 101 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that section 10(b) limitations period begins to run when the employee "discovers, or in the exercise of reasonable diligence should have discovered, the acts constituting the alleged [violation]"

  5. Ted Hicks & Associates, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    572 F.2d 1024 (5th Cir. 1978)   Cited 13 times
    In Ted Hicks, however, a new master agreement was negotiated prior to the termination of the previous master agreement, and thus there was no gap period between master agreements.

  6. Road Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    600 F.2d 918 (D.C. Cir. 1979)   Cited 10 times

    Nos. 77-1948, 77-1977. Argued January 8, 1979. Decided April 11, 1979. Angelo V. Arcadipane, Washington, D.C., with whom William W. Osborne, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on brief, for petitioner in No. 77-1948. Hiram S. Grossman, Flint, Mich., for petitioners in No. 77-1977 and intervenors in No. 77-1948. David F. Zorensky, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., with whom John S. Irving, Gen. Counsel, Carl L. Taylor, Associate Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, and William R. Stewart