§

Cedar Construction

17-CA-024530 (N.L.R.B. Nov. 24, 2009)
Cedar Construction

11 Cited authorities

  1. Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    522 U.S. 359 (1998)   Cited 426 times   13 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the Board "is not free to prescribe what inferences from the evidence it will accept and reject, but must draw all those inferences that the evidence fairly demands"

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 313 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Curtin Matheson Scientific, Inc.

    494 U.S. 775 (1990)   Cited 177 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that Board has "considerable deference" in determining the legal rule to apply and should be upheld "as long as it is rational and consistent with the Act"

  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Acme Industrial Co.

    385 U.S. 432 (1967)   Cited 265 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Approving "discovery-type standard"

  5. Brooks v. Labor Board

    348 U.S. 96 (1954)   Cited 300 times
    Holding that an employer has a duty to bargain in good faith for one year beginning on the date of certification of the bargaining representative by the Board

  6. Labor Board v. Truitt Mfg. Co.

    351 U.S. 149 (1956)   Cited 223 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the duty to produce information relevant to a bargaining issue is derivative from the broader statutory duty to bargain in good-faith

  7. Auciello Iron Works, Inc. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    517 U.S. 781 (1996)   Cited 59 times   5 Legal Analyses
    Holding that NLRB is due "considerable deference . . . by virtue of its charge to develop national labor policy"

  8. Pioneer Inn Associates v. N.L.R.B

    578 F.2d 835 (9th Cir. 1978)   Cited 42 times
    Upholding "contract bar" rule that Board will not conduct decertification election during life of contract even if majority of employees withdraws support from union

  9. Curtiss-Wright, Wright Aero. Div. v. N.L.R.B

    347 F.2d 61 (3d Cir. 1965)   Cited 55 times
    Noting the Board has "considerable leeway in amplifying or expanding certain details not specifically set forth in the complaint if they accord with the general substance of the complaint"

  10. Manna Pro Partners, L.P. v. N.L.R.B

    986 F.2d 1346 (10th Cir. 1993)   Cited 9 times

    No. 91-9563. March 1, 1993. Timothy K. Kellett of Armstrong, Teasdale, Schlafly Davis, St. Louis, MO (Joan Z. Cohen of Armstrong, Teasdale, Schlafly Davis, James L. Harrison, John R. Trigg of Parcel, Mauro, Hultin Spaanstra, P.C., with him on the brief), for petitioner. Howard E. Perlstein, Atty., N.L.R.B. (Jerry M. Hunter, General Counsel, D. Randall Frye, Acting Deputy General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, with him on the brief), Washington, DC, for respondent