§

Catapult Innovations Pty Ltd. v. adidas AG

13077510 - (R) (P.T.A.B. Oct. 15, 2014)
Catapult Innovations Pty Ltd. v. adidas AG

3 Cited authorities

  1. Coleman v. Dines

    754 F.2d 353 (Fed. Cir. 1985)   Cited 95 times   5 Legal Analyses
    In Coleman v. Dines (1985) 754 F.2d 353 (Coleman), the appellant testified that he conceived the invention at issue in that case prior to the date of the respondent's patent, and he relied on a letter he sent to a colleague about his work as corroboration for his testimony.

  2. Section 42.71 - Decision on petitions or motions

    37 C.F.R. § 42.71   Cited 21 times   40 Legal Analyses

    (a)Order of consideration. The Board may take up petitions or motions for decisions in any order, may grant, deny, or dismiss any petition or motion, and may enter any appropriate order. (b)Interlocutory decisions. A decision on a motion without a judgment is not final for the purposes of judicial review. If a decision is not a panel decision, the party may request that a panel rehear the decision. When rehearing a non-panel decision, a panel will review the decision for an abuse of discretion. A

  3. Section 42.405 - Content of petition

    37 C.F.R. § 42.405   7 Legal Analyses

    (a)Grounds for standing. The petition must: (1) Demonstrate compliance with §§ 42.402 and 42.403 ; and (2) Show that the petitioner has at least one claim that is: (i) The same or substantially the same as the respondent's claimed invention; and (ii) The same or substantially the same as the invention disclosed to the respondent. (b) In addition to the requirements of §§ 42.8 and 42.22 , the petition must: (1) Provide sufficient information to identify the application or patent for which the petitioner