Catalytic Industrial Maintenance

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Great Dane Trailers, Inc.

    388 U.S. 26 (1967)   Cited 323 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that substantial evidence supported the Board's finding of discriminatory conduct as the Company failed to meet its burden of establishing legitimate motives for its conduct
  2. N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.

    662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981)   Cited 358 times   46 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
  3. Esmark, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    887 F.2d 739 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 123 times
    Finding "direct participation" theory of liability "limited to situations in which the parent corporation's control over the particular transactions is exercised in disregard of the separate corporate identity of the subsidiary"
  4. National Fabricators, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    903 F.2d 396 (5th Cir. 1990)   Cited 3 times

    No. 89-4718. June 19, 1990. Murphy J. Foster, III, Breazeale, Sachse Wilson, Baton Rouge, La., for petitioner, cross-respondent. Paul J. Spielberg and Aileen Armstrong, Deputy Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent, cross-petitioner. Joseph G. Norton, Acting Director, Labor Relations Bd., New Orleans, La., for other interested parties. Petition for Review and Cross Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before THORNBERRY, GEE, and

  5. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,908 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions