All State & Fed.
JX
Search the Law
Search
§
Help
Sign In
Back to
Results
Carvel Corp. v. Ice Cream Bakery
No. 91092814 (T.T.A.B. May. 19, 1999)
Copy Cite
Read
Read
Attorney Analyses
Analyses
Citing Briefs
Briefs
Citing Cases
Citing Cases
Cited Authorities
Cited Authorities
8
Carvel Corp. v. Ice Cream Bakery
8
Cited authorities
Two Pesos, Inc. v. Taco Cabana, Inc.
505 U.S. 763 (1992)
Cited 2,010 times
35 Legal Analyses
Holding that to establish a claim for trade dress infringement, secondary meaning, non-functionality and likelihood of confusion must all be shown
Fidelity Construction Co. v. U.S.
464 U.S. 826 (1983)
Cited 159 times
Applying Compton favorably
Taco Cabana Intern., Inc. v. Two Pesos, Inc.
932 F.2d 1113 (5th Cir. 1991)
Cited 249 times
5 Legal Analyses
Holding district court has “considerable discretion in fashioning an appropriate remedy for infringement”
K. F. C. v. Diversified Packaging
549 F.2d 368 (5th Cir. 1977)
Cited 221 times
2 Legal Analyses
Holding that the "determinative question" in applying common law tort of unfair competition is "whether the tortfeasor's practices are likely to mislead customers into believing that the product emanates from or has been endorsed by the claimant"
National Cable Television v. Am. Cinema
937 F.2d 1572 (Fed. Cir. 1991)
Cited 83 times
Rejecting contention that “American Cinema Editors” did not have trademark rights in the acronym “ACE”
Ritchie v. Simpson
170 F.3d 1092 (Fed. Cir. 1999)
Cited 48 times
1 Legal Analyses
Finding “real interest” is shown by “a direct and personal stake in the outcome” or a “legitimate personal interest.”
Visa, U.S.A. v. Birmingham Trust Nat. Bank
696 F.2d 1371 (Fed. Cir. 1982)
Cited 60 times
Holding that a "naked assignment" of a trademark without the accompanying goodwill was valid because it did not serve to confuse consumers
Interstate Brands v. Celestial Seasonings
576 F.2d 926 (C.C.P.A. 1978)
Cited 12 times
Finding no error in the citation to third-party registrations