Carthage Sheet Metal Co., Inc. And Sheet Metal Products, Inc., Alter Egos

9 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Bildisco & Bildisco

    465 U.S. 513 (1984)   Cited 1,163 times   22 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the failure of Congress to draft an exclusion for certain collective bargaining agreements in 11 U.S.C. § 365 indicates that the provision applies to all such agreements, in light of the previous use of such an exclusion by Congress in 11 U.S.C. § 1167
  2. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 103, International Ass'n of Bridge, Structural & Ornamental Iron Workers

    434 U.S. 335 (1978)   Cited 286 times
    Affirming a cease and desist order issued by the National Labor Relations Board to a striking, uncertified union, which the union alleged was inconsistent with a prior ruling of the agency
  3. Detroit Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    440 U.S. 301 (1979)   Cited 228 times   20 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union's request for employee aptitude tests was relevant to its claim, but employer's interest in preserving confidentiality was also legitimate, and disclosing the information only upon the employee's written consent was a reasonable accommodation
  4. Radio Union v. Broadcast Serv

    380 U.S. 255 (1965)   Cited 327 times
    Holding that two entities were a single employer and therefore that their gross receipts could be totaled together to establish jurisdiction under the National Labor Relations Act
  5. Road Sprinkler Fitters Local U., v. N.L.R.B

    676 F.2d 826 (D.C. Cir. 1982)   Cited 28 times
    Holding that waiver of statutory rights must be "clear and unmistakable"
  6. Local No. 150, International Union of Operating Engineers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    480 F.2d 1186 (D.C. Cir. 1973)   Cited 29 times

    No. 71-1689. June 20, 1973. Bernard M. Baum, Daniel S. Shulman, Robert H. Baum, Chicago, Ill., and J. Albert Woll, Washington, D.C., were on the brief for petitioner. Peter G. Nash, Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Washington, D.C., at the time the brief was filed, Charles N. Steele, and Alan D. Cirker, Washington, D.C., Attys., N.L.R.B., were on the brief for respondent. Petition for review from the National Labor Relations Board. Before McGOWAN, Circuit Judge, and WINTER

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Leonard B. Hebert, Jr. Co.

    696 F.2d 1120 (5th Cir. 1983)   Cited 14 times
    Holding that the union "has the initial burden of showing relevancy" where it alleges that the employer is using "double breasted operations" to evade contractual obligations with the union, i.e., the employer is allegedly operating two corporations, one hiring strictly union employees, and the other, nonunion employees, to compete for both union and nonunion work
  8. N.L.R.B. v. Bell Co., Inc.

    561 F.2d 1264 (7th Cir. 1977)   Cited 17 times
    In NLRB v. Bell Co., Inc., 561 F.2d 1264 (7th Cir. 1977), the court found that while there was substantial similarity between the operations of the original and subsequent employers, no evidence existed that the prior owners "controlled or benefited from the operation" of the new business.
  9. Section 6621 - Determination of rate of interest

    26 U.S.C. § 6621   Cited 1,894 times   23 Legal Analyses
    Applying a higher interest rate to past liabilities resulting from tax-motivated transactions