Carry Cos. of Illinois
4 Cited authorities
N.L.R.B. v. Wright Line, a Div. of Wright Line, Inc.
662 F.2d 899 (1st Cir. 1981) Cited 358 times 46 Legal AnalysesHolding that the "but for" test applied in a "mixed motive" case under the National Labor Relations Act
N.L.R.B. v. Hale Container Line, Inc.
943 F.2d 394 (4th Cir. 1991) Cited 3 timesAffirming Board finding that an employee's termination was pretextual where the rationale offered by the employer was inconsistent with its recent exemplary evaluation of the employee's performance
Connecticut Distributors, Inc. v. N.L.R.B
681 F.2d 127 (2d Cir. 1982) Cited 4 timesIn Connecticut Distributors, Inc. v. N.L.R.B., supra, 681 F.2d 127 the court stated: "Even assuming Capasso's duties were supervisory, however, the Board erred in saddling the company with responsibility for his antiunion efforts.
Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Ogle Protection Service, Inc.
444 F.2d 502 (6th Cir. 1971) Cited 3 times 3 Legal AnalysesNo. 21049. June 30, 1971. Stanley R. Zirkin, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner; Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Elliott Moore, Stanley R. Zirkin, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., on brief. Douglas C. Dahn, Detroit, Mich., for respondents; Tolleson, Burgess Mead, Robert D. Welchli, Detroit, Mich., on brief. Before CELEBREZZE, PECK and McCREE, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM. This case is before us a second