§
Carrier Corp.

12 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Katz

    369 U.S. 736 (1962)   Cited 710 times   29 Legal Analyses
    Holding that "an employer's unilateral change in conditions of employment under negotiation" is a violation of the National Labor Relations Act because "it is a circumvention of the duty to negotiate"

  2. Metropolitan Edison Co. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    460 U.S. 693 (1983)   Cited 311 times   8 Legal Analyses
    Holding that a union may, under certain circumstances, waive members' NLRA rights

  3. Esmark, Inc. v. N.L.R.B

    887 F.2d 739 (7th Cir. 1989)   Cited 123 times
    Finding "direct participation" theory of liability "limited to situations in which the parent corporation's control over the particular transactions is exercised in disregard of the separate corporate identity of the subsidiary"

  4. United States v. Western Elec. Co., Inc.

    569 F. Supp. 1057 (D.D.C. 1983)   Cited 67 times
    Explaining that a proposed intraLATA dialing parity rule to be included in the consent decree "would inappropriately override state regulators' authority to decide what intrastate calling arrangements are best suited to the public interest within their states."

  5. N.L.R.B. v. Carilli

    648 F.2d 1206 (9th Cir. 1981)   Cited 38 times
    In NLRB v. Carilli, 648 F.2d 1206 (9th Cir. 1981), an employer cited § 186(c)(5)(B) in attacking the NLRB's finding that it violated Section 8(a)(5) of the NLRA by discontinuing payments to a trust fund.

  6. Stone Boat Yard v. N.L.R.B

    715 F.2d 441 (9th Cir. 1983)   Cited 22 times
    Concluding that knowledge possessed by union members was not attributable to union because there was no evidence in the record that the members were agents of the union

  7. N.L.R.B. v. Glover Bottled Gas Corp.

    905 F.2d 681 (2d Cir. 1990)   Cited 10 times

    No. 1312, Docket 90-4022. Argued May 7, 1990. Decided June 13, 1990. William M. Bernstein, N.L.R.B. (Jerry M. Hunter, General Counsel, Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., of counsel), for petitioner. Arthur R. Kaufman (Peter A. Schneider, Kaufman, Frank, Naness, Schneider Rosensweig, Melville, N.Y., of counsel), for respondent. Petition from National Labor Relations Board. Before ALTIMARI and MAHONEY, Circuit

  8. N.L.R.B. v. Walker Const. Co.

    928 F.2d 695 (5th Cir. 1991)   Cited 4 times

    No. 90-4264. April 15, 1991. Howard E. Perlstein, Paul Hitterman, Aileen Armstrong, Deputy Assoc. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner. Larry W. Wilshire, Richard W. Wiseman, Brown, Herman, Scott, Dean Miles, Ft. Worth, Tex., for respondent. James Walker, Ft. Worth, Tex., for Walker Const. Co. Application for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board. Before CLARK, Chief Judge, RONEY, and DUHE, Circuit Judges. Circuit Judge of the Eleventh Circuit, sitting

  9. Connecticut Light Power Company v. N.L.R.B

    476 F.2d 1079 (2d Cir. 1973)   Cited 17 times
    In Connecticut Light Power Co. v. NLRB, 476 F.2d 1079 (2d Cir. 1973), the court held that the company did not violate its obligation to bargain collectively by refusing to negotiate the selection of the carrier for its employee medical-surgical benefits plan.

  10. Bastian-Blessing, Division of Golconda Corp. v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    474 F.2d 49 (6th Cir. 1973)   Cited 17 times
    Ruling that "[h]ealth insurance benefits clearly represent mandatory subjects for bargaining" and holding that the company's unilateral change in insurance providers was a "change in conditions of employment" under the NLRA because the record revealed that the new plan did not offer the same levels of coverage as the previous plan