Carriage Inn of Steubenville

5 Cited authorities

  1. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. J. H. Rutter-Rex Manufacturing Co.

    396 U.S. 258 (1969)   Cited 185 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the NLRB "is not required to place the consequences of its own delay, even if inordinate, upon wronged employees to the benefit of wrongdoing employers."
  2. Union Starch Ref. v. Natl. Labor Rel. Bd.

    186 F.2d 1008 (7th Cir. 1951)   Cited 51 times
    In Union Starch, the employees had tendered dues and an initiation fee but were denied membership in the union for refusal to file union application forms, attend a union meeting or take the union oath.
  3. Olin Industries v. National Labor Rel. Board

    192 F.2d 799 (5th Cir. 1952)   Cited 11 times

    No. 13275. Rehearing Denied November 30, 1951. Second Petition for Rehearing Denied January 14, 1952. Benjamin E. Gordon, Boston, Mass., for petitioner. Frederick U. Reel, Atty., N.L.R.B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for respondent. Before McCORD, RUSSELL and RIVES, Circuit Judges. RIVES, Circuit Judge. The proof discloses that all of the charges were filed and were served by ordinary mail prior to the effective

  4. Section 102.24 - Motions; where to file; contents; service on other parties; promptness in filing and response; default judgment procedures; summary judgment procedures

    29 C.F.R. § 102.24   Cited 12 times
    Requiring denial of summary judgment "where the motion itself fails to establish the absence of a genuine issue, or where the opposing party's pleadings, opposition and/or response indicate on their face that a genuine issue may exist"
  5. Section 102.16 - Hearing; change of date or place

    29 C.F.R. § 102.16   Cited 3 times

    (a) Upon the Regional Director's own motion or upon proper cause shown by any other party, the Regional Director issuing the complaint may extend the hearing date or change the hearing place, except that the Regional Director's authority to extend the hearing date is limited to the following circumstances: (1) Where all parties agree or no party objects to extension of the hearing date; (2) Where a new charge or charges have been filed which, if meritorious, might be appropriate for consolidation