§

Carpenters (Society Hill Towers Owners' Assn.)

335 N.L.R.B. 814 (N.L.R.B. 2001)
Carpenters (Society Hill Towers Owners' Assn.)

8 Cited authorities

  1. Kovacs v. Cooper

    336 U.S. 77 (1949)   Cited 776 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Holding that, consistent with the First Amendment, the government may regulate the volume of speech and the hours and place of public discussion

  2. Martin v. Struthers

    319 U.S. 141 (1943)   Cited 577 times   4 Legal Analyses
    Holding invalid the total prohibition of door-to-door distribution of literature

  3. Pye v. Teamsters Local Union No. 122

    61 F.3d 1013 (1st Cir. 1995)   Cited 17 times
    Classifying group shopping trips-which included union members using up virtually all of a store's parking lot, occupying much of the store's interior shopping area, and causing long checkout lines through repeated purchases of small items with large bills-as a form of economic pressure on a neutral customer of the primary employer, and thus a form of coercion under Section 8(b)(B)

  4. Sheet Metal Wkrs, v. N.L.R.B

    905 F.2d 417 (D.C. Cir. 1990)   Cited 13 times
    Affirming NLRB finding that union violated Section 8(e) where it attempted to secure a union-only clause as part of existing collective bargaining agreement by denying employers who refused discretionary wage and benefit concessions

  5. District 29, United Mine Workers v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

    977 F.2d 1470 (D.C. Cir. 1992)   Cited 1 times

    No. 91-1442. Argued September 9, 1992. Decided October 30, 1992. As Amended October 30, 1992. George N. Davies, Birmingham, Ala., with whom Earl V. Brown, Jr., Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for petitioner. William A. Baudler, Attorney, N.L.R.B. ("NLRB"), with whom Jerry M Hunter, General Counsel, Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, and Paul J. Spielberg, Deputy Asst. Atty. Gen. Counsel, NLRB, Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for respondent. Petition for Review of an Order

  6. Barker Brothers Corporation v. N.L.R.B

    328 F.2d 431 (9th Cir. 1964)   Cited 5 times
    In Barker Bros., the Board held that no such effect had occurred where "there were only 3 delivery stoppages, 2 work delays, and several delivery delays" and where, in addition, "the record (was) virtually silent as to not only the nature and quantity of the products that failed to reach their destination, but also the impact of the stoppage and/or delays on the Employer's business."

  7. Rule 403 - Excluding Relevant Evidence for Prejudice, Confusion, Waste of Time, or Other Reasons

    Fed. R. Evid. 403   Cited 23,325 times   86 Legal Analyses
    Adopting a similar standard, but requiring the probative value to be "substantially outweighed" by these risks

  8. Rule 803 - Exceptions to the Rule Against Hearsay-Regardless of Whether the Declarant Is Available as a Witness

    Fed. R. Evid. 803   Cited 12,987 times   85 Legal Analyses
    Recognizing exception to rule against hearsay for records of regularly conducted activities