Carpenters Local Union 1260

14 Cited authorities

  1. Labor Board v. Denver Bldg. Council

    341 U.S. 675 (1951)   Cited 494 times   1 Legal Analyses
    Affirming Board's assertion of jurisdiction over activities taking place at local construction site based on finding that "any widespread application of the practices charged might well result in substantially decreasing" the flow of interstate commerce
  2. Electrical Workers v. Labor Board

    341 U.S. 694 (1951)   Cited 246 times   2 Legal Analyses
    Holding that the prohibition of picketing in furtherance of unlawful objectives is not an abridgement of free speech
  3. Labor Board v. Drivers Local Union

    362 U.S. 274 (1960)   Cited 109 times   1 Legal Analyses
    In NLRB v. Drivers Local 639, 362 U.S. 274 (1960), the Court held that § 8(b)(1)(A) was "a grant of power to the Board limited to authority to proceed against union tactics involving violence, intimidation, and reprisal or threats thereof."
  4. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers

    467 F.2d 1158 (2d Cir. 1972)   Cited 20 times
    Stating that actual authorization or subsequent ratification is not required to hold union responsible for act of member as agent
  5. Department Specialty Store Emp. Un. v. Brown

    284 F.2d 619 (9th Cir. 1961)   Cited 30 times

    No. 16843. November 15, 1960. As Amended January 13, 1961. Carroll, Davis, Burdick McDonough, Roland C. Davis, San Francisco, Cal., S.G. Lippman, Washington, D.C., for appellant. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Norton J. Come, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras, Atty., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for appellee. Before MERRILL and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges, and KILKENNY, District Judge. KILKENNY, District Judge. Appeal

  6. N.L.R.B. v. Local 182, Int. Bro. of Teamsters

    314 F.2d 53 (2d Cir. 1963)   Cited 26 times

    No. 224, Docket 27524. Argued December 4, 1962. Decided January 28, 1963. Norton J. Come, Washington, D.C. (Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, James C. Paras and Lee M. Modjeska, Washington, D.C., Attys.), for petitioner. George Schiro, Utica, N.Y., submitted brief for respondent. Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, and SWAN and FRIENDLY, Circuit Judges. FRIENDLY, Circuit Judge. The National Labor Relations Board seeks enforcement

  7. Centralia Bldg. Const. Trades v. N.L.R.B

    363 F.2d 699 (D.C. Cir. 1966)   Cited 18 times
    In Centralia, moreover, the court emphasized that the employer "would have been required to throw open its records as to such payments that monthly inspection might be made" by the picketing union.
  8. Dallas Bldg., Trades v. N.L.R.B

    396 F.2d 677 (D.C. Cir. 1968)   Cited 16 times
    In Dallas Building Construction Trades Council v. NLRB, 396 F.2d 677 (D.C.Cir. 1968), a clause similar to the one in Connell was at issue.
  9. N.L.R.B. v. Local 815

    290 F.2d 99 (2d Cir. 1961)   Cited 23 times
    Noting that "a principal may be held responsible for the acts of an agent whom it has placed in such a position that persons dealing with the agent reasonably believe the acts to be authorized"
  10. Dayton Typographical Union No. 57 v. N.L.R.B

    326 F.2d 634 (D.C. Cir. 1963)   Cited 15 times

    No. 17058. Argued March 14, 1963. Decided November 14, 1963. Mr. George Kaufmann, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. Gerhard P. Van Arkel, Washington, D.C., and Robert A. Wilson, Cincinnati, Ohio, were on the brief, for petitioners. Mr. Norton J. Come, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., with whom Messrs. Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel at the time the brief was filed, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, and Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., were on the brief, for respondent. Before